Many people believe that countries should produce food for the whole population and import as little food as possible. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Oxygen is quite important to live but without having adequate food it is impossible. Many of the food consumed in the countries are imported from thousands of miles away from where it is produced. Strata of the populace reiterate that nations should be self-sufficient in terms of food and minimize the food importation from other countries.
To begin with, firstly, the food which is produced in the other countries needs to travel a long distance and consume a large amount of energy and a large storage is required for storing the food before transportation. Apart from this, due to long-distance in the transportation, the perishable food is added unhealthily preservatives so that food can be saved from ruin. Moreover, as the foreign products provide a large number of choices to the consumers they dampen the sale of locally produced goods. For instance, the survey done by “The Time” reveals that tomatoes are more prone to deterioration hence, around 80 percent of the tomatoes are saved in the transportation only because of these preservatives.
Furthermore, locally produced food is fresh and at first hand with no added chemical with no risk to health. These productions increase the economic status of the country because local merchants and business are at a profit which in turn invest more in the economy and generate different new job opportunities for the people. The vegetation greatly depends on the weather and climate, hence, so countries cannot afford the food, therefore, they import more food. However, the government should impose the ban on the export of the product in which they are enough sufficient. For instance, India is self-sufficient in the production of the maze even though a large amount of maze is imported from America. The government should spend this money on research and development on how the quality of maze instead of increasing its import.
To conclude, local foods are free from harmful preservatives and are more cost-effective for consumer. In addition, the government should control the import of food that can be grown in their respective country to strengthen their local economy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-14 | Bisiolat21 | 73 | view |
| 2020-05-09 | kjot_59 | 73 | view |
- Tourism is an ever growing industry What benefits do you think tourism brings to individuals and society 61
- Some think that governments should tax unhealthy foods to encourage people to eat healthier To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people believe that to give opportunities to the new generation companies should encourage high level employees who are older than 55 to retire Do you agree or disagree 67
- Fewer schools are requiring children to learn and improve their handwriting skills Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages of this trend 61
- You rented a car from Car Rental Company The air conditioner has stopped working You phoned the company a week ago but it still has not been repaired Write a letter to the company In your letter introduce yourself explain the situation say what action you 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 415, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...reover, as the foreign products provide a large number of choices to the consumers they dampen th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, apart from, for instance, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1798.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97538565643 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531609195402 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.567419878 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.866666667 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.13333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270523910558 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0995215107544 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557672991249 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18469075574 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346523819703 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.