Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their own countries What are the reasons What are the solutions to change negative attitudes

Although international tourism is the booming industry worldwide and it provides lots of economic thrust to the host country, may people think is detrimental to the host nation. The reason or ill-effect of the international tourism are mentioned below.

The proponents of international tourism believes that foreigner have different culture and traditional belief. So during stay or visit by expats, local people feels that culture and folklore are not followed and foreigner impose their culture in day to day activities and its threat to nation whose is culturally rich. Many countries like India , Pakistan, Arebian are more traditional and they have immense respect for their culture. For this reason, they expect tourist to follow it and any violation lead to conflicts. To illustrate, recently in Mumbai, two female tourists were not allowed in the temple because they were not wearing traditional attire. It is also believed that over international tourism put strain on the natural resources of that country and creates other issues like pollution, congestion and other socio-economical imbalance. To counter this, many countries like Bhutan has imposed higher visa fees.
Supporter of the international tourism feels that, tourism industry boosts economy of the country which is not industrialize or government do not want more industrialization due to many reason such as pollution. Consequently, better employment for the locals in service sector reduced jobless claim and crime rates in country. This also helps government to focus more on state of art infrastructure which is backbone of any developed or progressing country. It is imperative for the government for government to set up tourism offices which provide details about the culture and tradition and do and don’ts list to avoid any culture conflicts. As the same time tourists are equally responsible to know and understand culture of Visiting County to adjust them during the stay. Many countries in Europe and other part of the world have promoted tourism to boost the economy.
So in my opinion, International tourism is good for the country if the government designs and promulgates policy which are beneficial to the economy of the country and helps country to develop better infrastructure which enhances the recognition of the country on socio-economic parameters across the globe.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...lturally rich. Many countries like India , Pakistan, Arebian are more traditional ...
^^
Line 4, column 112, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'industrialized'.
Suggestion: industrialized
...sts economy of the country which is not industrialize or government do not want more industri...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 182, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun reason seems to be countable; consider using: 'many reasons'.
Suggestion: many reasons
... not want more industrialization due to many reason such as pollution. Consequently, better...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o-economic parameters across the globe.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, may, so, such as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2004.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43089430894 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01953222738 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528455284553 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 633.6 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8316067107 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.25 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0625 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4375 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2315415935 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801718086602 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512611688326 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147864621101 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0165398406824 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...lturally rich. Many countries like India , Pakistan, Arebian are more traditional ...
^^
Line 4, column 112, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'industrialized'.
Suggestion: industrialized
...sts economy of the country which is not industrialize or government do not want more industri...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 182, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun reason seems to be countable; consider using: 'many reasons'.
Suggestion: many reasons
... not want more industrialization due to many reason such as pollution. Consequently, better...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o-economic parameters across the globe.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, may, so, such as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2004.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43089430894 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01953222738 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528455284553 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 633.6 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8316067107 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.25 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0625 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4375 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2315415935 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801718086602 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512611688326 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147864621101 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0165398406824 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.