Many people believe that reducing speed limit is the best option for road safety improvement. Do you think there are measures that could put in place . What are the advantages and disadvantaes of this?
There is a belief that the road safety could be improved by minimizing speed limit. Although this remedy has significant impacts on the road safety, there are cheaper alternatives to achieve the final goal which is drivers' safety in the roads. I will explain not only better alternatives but also an advantage and disadvantage to reduce speed limit in this essay.
A first and most important alternative measure may be to increase the education programs via media. If people had sufficient information about the dangers of riding at high speed, they would try to drive carefully at low speed to be safe from the road accidents. In addition, an effective plan might be the encouraging ways. The governments could implement this plan in various ways. For example, if people observe the restricted speed during a year, they will be able to gain 30% discount for renewal of their cars' insurance. Thus, this solution has positive points for both people and governments.
Turning to the primary merit and demerit of reducing speed limit, the main benefit is to decrease the death rate of the road accidents. According to annual statistics, there are a multitude of accidents which is caused by high speed. The determination of limited speed would lower these statistics. To contrast this positive point, there is a drawback which is the subsequent costs to fulfil an aim. The government will need to employ a lot of new traffic policies and install some speed cameras which can supervise cars' speed.
To conclude, the alternative ways consist of the education and encouragement seem to be more economical. However, reducing speed limit has an advantage to decrease the accident statistics. Moreover, the negative point of this is to need extra budget for applying. It seems to me that the education policy is the best way to obtain final target.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02931596091 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74598822969 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57003257329 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9973474981 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.7777777778 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0555555556 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263177331249 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840562348114 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057711930274 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164253580447 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450493724023 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.