Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the government, rather than by private companies. to what extent do you agree or disagree?
The incredibly fast pace of technological growth, and consequently the recent commercial break-throughs achieved by scientists has drawn several private corporations’ attention into making huge investments in scientific research. However, this upward trends appears to be under fire by those raising doubts as to whether the private sector is competent enough. Personally, I tend to align myself with the group advocating government’s domination over research related to critical issues.
On the one hand, there are some people subscribing to the idea that strongly advocates private firms effective co-operation in conducting studies. It is often argued that organizations which are being run by private shareholders benefit from higher degrees of freedom when it comes to decision-making; thus, scientists’ studies are more probable to lead to desirable results. A further argument in favour of private sector’s intervention in scientific areas might be the public concern regarding the amount of money being spent on dead-end research. A sizeable number of people explicitly condemn the government for the so-called squandering of the national budget on investigations which utterly failed to meet their specified objectives.
Although opponents’ argument seems to be sensitive to a certain extent, I tend to refute any further engagement of private companies in research, especially those of vital importance. One serious hazard interwoven with mandating corporation to carry out essential studies would be the lack of transparency in private sector. There is no practical measure to appraise the real upshot of corporations’ collabo-ration. In addition, some companies might try to conceal their failures so as to maintain their reputation; hence, there is likely to lose both time and capital without reaching a positive result. Moreover, greed can sometimes pervert companies as their main cause. An illustration of this could be Afex Corporation, having figured out potential profits involved with their innovative drug, they ridiculously increased the price of their products; thus, this vital medicine has slipped of less affordable families’ grasp.
Taking all above-mentioned points into considerations, it does not seem far-fetched to arrive at a concluding view that although there are some rational arguments against government’s domination over scientific researchers, we should not explicitly deny the risks involved. Given to what have been mentioned, I strongly support government’s predominant role in all principal studies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 313, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...o be under fire by those raising doubts as to whether the private sector is competent enough....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 491, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ies might try to conceal their failures so as to maintain their reputation; hence, there...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, as to, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 8.36945812808 24% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 31.9359605911 194% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 5.75862068966 313% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2227.0 1207.87684729 184% => OK
No of words: 374.0 242.827586207 154% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.95454545455 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 3.92707691288 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.50340952391 2.71678728327 129% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 139.433497537 176% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655080213904 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 685.8 379.143842365 181% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.6157635468 195% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2349746537 50.4703680194 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.466666667 104.977214359 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9333333333 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53333333333 7.25397266985 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 2.75862068966 290% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160005634861 0.242375264174 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050808663849 0.0925447433944 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458675105692 0.071462118173 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0915816034837 0.151781067708 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226103246075 0.0609392437508 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 12.6369458128 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.53 11.5310837438 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.4 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 55.0591133005 240% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.