Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
it is true that some scientific research is conducted by private cooperations, and others are run by the state. While some people believe that companies should be allowed to carry out research on their own, I would argue that it is the responsibility of the governments to be in charge.
The private cooperations claim that they are qualified enough to undertake scientific research, but there are some potential problems may arise. Firstly, the quality and objectivity of the projects might be compromised. companies tend to be tempted to manipulate results of the research in order to maximize profits. This can lead to pernicious effects on the public, especially when the study is related to our health. Secondly, private companies are likely to choose projects that are financially beneficial, regardless of social consequences. In stead of carrying out research which would help to solve imperative problems now, they tend to fund promising research to their own business. For example, many agricultural companies have conducted research on genetic engineering, despite unproven effects of genetic-modified crops on people's health and the environment.
However, there are convincing reasons why the governments need to be responsible for funding and supervising scientific projects. For a financial perspective, the governments have a larger budget than private companies do. scientific research is usually exorbitant, which may be beyond the means of private oganisations. Meanwhile, the goverments have regular income from taxes and therefore could allocate part of the public purse for scientific study. In terms of social responsibility, research conducted by the state seems to offer a wide range of benefits. The governments should provide funding for university departments to carry out high-quality research. In addition, some specific areas of science that are important are likely to be prioritized, taking into consideration the needs of society, both present and future. One example is the development of sustainable energy to meet growing demands.
In conclusion, I profoundly believe that the governments should bear sole responsibility for scientific research.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-04 | nhiunbtran2011 | 78 | view |
| 2020-10-19 | Chirag Bhardwaj | 82 | view |
| 2019-03-11 | Tran Thao Nguyen | 65 | view |
- Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 65
- Computers are often argued to be the most important invention of the last hundred years. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 89
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is true that some scientific research i...
^^
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ity of the governments to be in charge. The private cooperations claim that they...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 221, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Companies
...y of the projects might be compromised. companies tend to be tempted to manipulate result...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 547, Rule ID: IN_STEAD_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Instead of'?
Suggestion: Instead of
...ial, regardless of social consequences. In stead of carrying out research which would help ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 871, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... on peoples health and the environment. However, there are convincing reasons wh...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 909, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ainable energy to meet growing demands. In conclusion, I profoundly believe that...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...responsibility for scientific research.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1864.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66565349544 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22191604045 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553191489362 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3177106696 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.555555556 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2777777778 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293345130999 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0908102528126 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670285946268 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203356853706 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398253546117 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.