many people spoil natural beauties like sea ,beaches ,mountains and lakes .do people responsible for that ?what should be done to stop people to spoil natural beauty ?give the reasons and examples for your answer.
Tourist places like beaches, hills and mountains attract a large number of visitors. The increase in human activity in these places also leads to littering. In fact, littering has become a major environmental issue in many tourist places.
When tourists throw around plastic cans and bottles, they not only destroy the natural beauty of picnic places but also cause many environmental problems. Fish and wild animals often swallow polythene wrappers while trying to eat the leftover food in them. This causes infection inside their body and eventually leads to their death. People are thronging to wildlife sanctuaries to get an opportunity to watch animals in their natural habitat. Unfortunately, they also leave behind a lot of things that can harm the environment and the wildlife.
In order to prevent this from happening, we need stringent laws. The government should impose hefty fines on people who violate these laws. There is little we can achieve by enacting laws. Enforcement is the key. For example, India has plenty of laws to protect the environment. Unfortunately, these laws aren’t always enforced and littering is rampant in this part of the world.
The government should also install facilities like recycling machines where tourists can drop their plastic bottles and cans. Another solution is to encourage the use of natural and biodegradable materials instead of plastic. In addition, the government should consider running eateries in these places where people can buy good food and water at reasonable rates. In many picnic places restaurants overcharge tourists. This forces many tourists to carry food and snacks with them. If there are restaurants and eateries that offer hygienic food at affordable rates, people will be less inclined to carry their food with them.
To conclude, picnic spots attract a large number of visitors. Unfortunately, this leads to littering. The only viable solution to this problem is to limit and discourage the use of plastic in these places through stringent laws and by installing recycling machines.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ke beaches, hills and mountains attract a large number of visitors. The increase in human activit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l issue in many tourist places. When tourists throw around plastic cans ...
^^^^
Line 17, column 369, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun picnic seems to be countable; consider using: 'many picnics'.
Suggestion: many picnics
... food and water at reasonable rates. In many picnic places restaurants overcharge tourists....
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 35, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... To conclude, picnic spots attract a large number of visitors. Unfortunately, this leads to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, while, for example, in addition, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1765.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39755351682 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73800914316 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544342507645 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5306407371 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.7391304348 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2173913043 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.82608695652 7.06120827912 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137150347542 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0349817783608 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410789527594 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0654562013724 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422943190535 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.