In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect countryside and not build new homes there.
Do you agree or disagree?
Ever-increasing demands on new residential dwellings have left little alternative but to destroy the countryside due to lacking building space. However, some people argue that it is of paramount importance to preserve the country. I agree with this idea mainly because of the loos of natural features and damaging impact on the environment.
To begin with, turning rural area to a construction site would probably deteriorate the pristine condition of nature. That is, when the neighbourhood is destroyed, the natural elements of nature will be disappeared, which are mainly trees, the green vegetation, and animal habitats. Removal of these features in order that building residential districts seem to change the region both ecologically and environmentally beyond recognition. Moreover, interference of human-being in nature appears to adversely affect the fragile ecosystem of the neighbourhood. The overwhelming majority of wild animals have to move to another places; therefore, their natural habitat would be smaller and smaller by the development of urbanization. These changes may push wild animals to enter residential areas in order to find an ample amount of food. Examples can be seen in the north of Iran where due to fast-growing building construction, wild animals have to come to the rural area for seeking food. Finally, another compelling argument against launching this scheme is that the more countryside is spoiled, the more adversely the environment is affected. To put it differently, the fragile environment is threatened by the ill effects of human activities, such as producing sewage and waste. Take the waste which is a perennial problem for example; the city dwellers will continue to produce household waste; consequently, either dumping the waste in nature of burning it is certainly more harmful to the environment. Thus, it seems advisable to avoid spoiling the countryside by building modern complexes.
Admittedly, it is true that due to the increasing rate of the baby-boom population, the demands on residential houses has increased dramatically. Although building construction in the countryside appears to be a viable solution, owing to the advent of new technologies in civil engineering, creating underground cities and modern and taller high-rises, for example, seem to be better options to protect the countryside.
In conclusion, It seems to me that the problem of spoiling nature, changing living pattern of wildlife and damaging impact on environment combine together to render the idea of destroying the country in favour of city expansion illogical. New developments in construction technics appear to help reduce the waste of space in urban areas.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 41.998997996 167% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2294.0 1615.20841683 142% => OK
No of words: 415.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52771084337 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1985444505 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551807228916 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 721.8 506.74238477 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5039113508 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.444444444 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0555555556 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05555555556 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166439846896 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505111451704 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575893067758 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111117978694 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054222833342 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 78.4519038076 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.