In many professional sports, there is an increase in the number of athletes using banned substances to improve their performance. What are the causes of the phenomenon and what are some of the possible solutions?
Undoubtedly, a vigorous inclination for the usage of illegal drugs among sportsmen in distinct terrains has been witnessed in the prevailing epoch. Reasonably, the consumption of such lethal medications by athletes is just for enhancing their competencies to fulfill the greed for victory. Since this is an unethical gesture, thus this overwhelming utilization could be mitigated through regular dope tests and stringent legislation.
Though every professional player exhibits his best to bring up the glory, unfortunately the world recognizes winners only. As a result of this, the need of belongingness in the heart of their admirers and the thirst for earning name and fame put them upon less trodden path of steroid consumption. Sadly, for the accomplishment of their personal aspirations and heavy flow of monetary services they indulge themselves irrationally in the drug trap without considering the untoward circumstances of such undesirable acts. Moreover, lack of sportsmanship supports the consumption of offensive substances which do not allow individuals to realize the guilt for their unsocial and malicious acts. And how one can forget the death of well known "WWE Superstar Eddie Gerarro" in ring which was due to cardiac-arrest as a consequence of drug over dosage. By ill luck, he was into drugs for winning the world title.
Interestingly, the joint ventures of authorities and sports foundations can upgrade the bar of dope test which could be the impeccable measure to curb this menace. Adamantly, it is the liability of supremacy to instill the knowledge of untoward consequences associated with this methodology of improving performance among the players. Seemingly, acquainting them with the crucial aspects of interpersonal relationships with other players and also imparting knowledge regarding social behavior are conductive in maintaining the delicacy of sports environment. Furthermore, effective supervision and harsh punishments can lead them to the righteous-path as it would be biased to overlook the data published by "The Tribune" stating that International sports federations have passed law of lifetime ban in case breach of code of conduct during games is observed for drug consumption.
To conclude, although their are distinctive roots for the amalgamation of drugs and lethal performance increasing medicines with professional sports, still widespread implementation of strict rules can create topple the statics of drug consumers and can keep the essence of sports alive for upcoming centuries
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-28 | deep979kaur | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-26 | SharmisthaNaskar | 61 | view |
| 2021-03-12 | ritud007 | 84 | view |
| 2020-09-06 | nainsi1991@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2020-05-02 | somu | 84 | view |
- people spent alot of money on various things as they earn more money nowadays than before is it a positive or negative development 89
- Many foods are shipped from far away Some people think that eating local food is more environmentally and economically Do you think the advantages outweigh its disadvantages 93
- After being involved in an accident you were looked after by a person you did not know before Write a special thank you letter to express your gratitude In your letter Introduce yourself and let him her know why you are writing Express your appreciation A 89
- people spent alot of money on various things as they earn more money nowadays than before is it a positive or negative development 95
- people spent a lot of money on various things as they earn more money nowadays than before is it a positive or negative development 95
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 919, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...into drugs for winning the world title. Interestingly, the joint ventures of aut...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 23, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...g consumption. To conclude, although their are distinctive roots for the amalgamat...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, look, moreover, regarding, so, still, thus, well, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2182.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 383.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69712793734 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30646251147 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 176.041082164 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634464751958 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 660.6 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.5436327593 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.857142857 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3571428571 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0997601388567 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0317971752499 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0252485147274 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0624541916509 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191957075164 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.0946893788 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.62 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 78.4519038076 175% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 919, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...into drugs for winning the world title. Interestingly, the joint ventures of aut...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 23, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...g consumption. To conclude, although their are distinctive roots for the amalgamat...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, look, moreover, regarding, so, still, thus, well, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2182.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 383.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69712793734 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30646251147 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 176.041082164 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634464751958 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 660.6 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.5436327593 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.857142857 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3571428571 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0997601388567 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0317971752499 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0252485147274 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0624541916509 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191957075164 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.0946893788 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.62 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 78.4519038076 175% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.