Many foods are shipped from far away Some people think that eating local food is more environmentally and economically Do you think the advantages outweigh its disadvantages

Essay topics:

Many foods are shipped from far away. Some people think that eating local food is more environmentally and economically. Do you think the advantages outweigh its disadvantages.

Since the evolution of humanity importing food from oversea terrains has gained high grounds. owing to this, a portion of demo-graphs vocalize that the ingestion of indigenous crops could be an impeccable way to ensure minimal carbon traces in the atmosphere and it might topple the financial stakes required for shipping the food. I adamantly cogitate that the assets associated to this scenario are far more than hidden prejudices.

Undoubtedly, catering the diverse eating needs of citizenry is the liability of supremacy, thus a variety of cuisines are transported globally. Seemingly, during the process of importing and exporting food, abundant amount of fuel is utilized and also the bar of carbon emissions in the environment get proliferated. consequently, preferring the native yield would mitigate this hassle up to a large extent. As far as economic merit is concerned, a sheer wastage of monetary sources can be witnessed during shipment of foreign food due to a hefty flow of capital. To exemplify, it was deduced by WTO that a massive share of national treasure could be saved by relying on local food.

Contrastly, solely leaning on the regional harvest sometime is not a decision as there are few hassles associated with it. Interestingly, the geographic settings of all terrains varies from each other , therefore, there could be lack of vegetation at few places. It would be ruthless to overlook the fact that natives of UAE cannot survive on its local food owing to lack of soil fertility and unproductive yield. On the top of that, natural climaties and other prevailing contemporary issues also exaggerate the necessity of shipped food. A wise example can be China and Italy where the COVID-19 virus has escalated the demand of foreign food because of destruction to indigenous species of flora and fauna.

To bind it up, although there are few downsides of shipped food but it is a crying need of the hour in some nations and terrains to depend upon import and export of cuisines. Thus, the merits in my perception outways the demerits.

Votes
Average: 9.3 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-05-23 johnrub 73 view
2021-01-08 smiley 56 view
2020-12-05 lindaja653 67 view
2020-11-11 Rachana92 73 view
2020-06-28 Sumo Stark 61 view
Essays by user munish jasrotia :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Since the evolution of humanity importing foo...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Owing
...ersea terrains has gained high grounds. owing to this, a portion of demo-graphs vocal...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
...ns in the environment get proliferated. consequently, preferring the native yield would miti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 201, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s of all terrains varies from each other , therefore, there could be lack of veget...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, look, so, therefore, thus

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08235294118 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84839058395 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617647058824 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4041926648 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.2 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19934105247 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593347079838 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358735899268 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11450611292 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0147862561436 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.