Men do most of the high-level jobs. Should the government encourage a certain percentage of these jobs to be reserved for women?
i am utterly agree with the statement that men do most of the high level-jobs. I belive that this is because of their intelligence level and the skills they
possess. However, i don't agree with option suggested above that there should be a reservation for womens for these jobs. Because i am entirely against reservation
systmem and oppose openly. I belive that reservation is not the right way to bring the equality. There are plenty of options available which can be reinforced to
bring the equality in high-level jobs. I sharing few points underneath to support my opinion on this.
Firstly, i would like to mention that gender base reserversation is not at helpful. This may lead to dissatisfaction among men employess and it is also possible
that derserving candidate loose the chanse because of reservation. Every post whether it is highl lever or low level should be filled on the basis of skills and
knowlege of the candidiate. This will help candidate to perform the job smoothly and error free. If the post is filled on the basis of reservation candidate may
not be the right because he/she is not selected on his skill and their selection is based on reservation.
Secondaly, there is one more negative consequence of this process. This may create a comfort among women that they don't need to do hard for getting a job because
that would be bases on reservation and they can easily grab the job just because of their gender. This type of comfort zone is not appreciable and women should focus
on hard working to get the equality in high-level jobs.
I would like to concluse and say there should not be any gender base reservation for any job. Every gender should encouraged to work hard to get the high level
jobs. Reservation is not the only solution for this.
Regards
Suraj
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-17 | aringa | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | Prabhp | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | Prabhp | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-11 | Saira Faiz | 89 | view |
| 2019-07-01 | BIBHU KALITA | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: I
i am utterly agree with the statement tha...
^
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
i am utterly agree with the statement tha...
^
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
i am utterly agree with the statement that men do most of ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 21, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...nd the skills they possess. However, i dont agree with option suggested above that ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 109, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e should be a reservation for womens for these jobs. Because i am entirely again...
^^
Line 2, column 116, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d be a reservation for womens for these jobs. Because i am entirely against rese...
^^
Line 2, column 132, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...on for womens for these jobs. Because i am entirely against reservation systme...
^
Line 3, column 30, Rule ID: PRP_RB_NO_VB[1]
Message: Are you missing a verb?
...servation systmem and oppose openly. I belive that reservation is not the right way to bri...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 40, Rule ID: I_AM[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I am'?
Suggestion: I am
... bring the equality in high-level jobs. I sharing few points underneath to suppor...
^
Line 6, column 10, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...support my opinion on this. Firstly, i would like to mention that gender base ...
^
Line 11, column 116, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... create a comfort among women that they dont need to do hard for getting a job becau...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83333333333 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67896572033 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477564102564 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0317779794 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.7777777778 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 7.06120827912 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 13.0 4.38176352705 297% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 11.0 5.01903807615 219% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375374127698 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108892457704 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0984325781192 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137941591659 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0819982704773 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.