The demand for private means of transport is rapidly growing in the contemporary society. This could be contributed to inaccuracy in public transport, it isn't as convenient and affordable to the masses. The below essay will delve into the various aspects of this phenomenon, and the various steps government can take to mitigate this.
To begin with, Public transport is redundant in some developed countries. For instance, in Bangalore, although metro was made available to the masses. However, it had limited range, over crowded, unavailability of flexible hours. Made this a hard choice among the masses. Consequently, personal vehicle despite likely to have huge initial investment, they where much more convenient. Furthermore, EMI provided by the government with monthly payments made them much more appealing to middle class. For instance, a recent survey conducted by BBC new reveled that 55% of people in the world use personal vehicle to commute.
As a consequence, the detrimental effects of this phenomenon cannot be refuted. Pollution level due to carbon emission is increasing day by day, Not only does this cause air pollution, but also contributes to global warming being a thing in today's epoch.
To mitigate the problem in hand, government has to take some pivotal steps. Firstly, making public transport affordable to majority of masses. For instance, China has provided a subscription plans for their metro, Thereby, Public can opt in and avail the benefits. Subsequently, the country managed to reduce the number of personal vehicles. Secondly, by making public transport more convenient and fast they can attract a lot of attention. Personal vehicles is indubitably more convenient, However, it is a time hog due to traffic jams being a norm. Therefore, by providing faster public transport they can engage a wider range of audiences.
To sum up, although personal vehicles are much preferred, they so pose a catastrophic risk to the environment. By investing in public transport government can potentially curb this phenomenon.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ed to inaccuracy in public transport it isnt as convenient and affordable to the mas...
^^^^
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'steps'' or 'step's'?
Suggestion: steps'; step's
...ects of this phenomenon and the various steps government can take to mitigate this ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: THEY_WHERE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'were', the simple past of "to be"?
Suggestion: were
...ly to have huge initial investment they where much more convenient Furthermore EMI pr...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 466, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y payments made them much more appealing to middle class For instance a recent su...
^^
Line 3, column 604, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he world use personal vehicle to commute As a consequence the detrimental effects...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al warming being a thing in todays epoch To mitigate the problem in hand governme...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent can potentially curb this phenomenon
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, for instance, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1691.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23529411765 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84635146894 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547987616099 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 323.0 20.2975951904 1591% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1691.0 106.682146367 1585% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 323.0 20.7667163134 1555% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 141.0 7.06120827912 1997% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267003974633 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.267003974633 0.084324248473 317% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144158644057 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731068619021 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 164.8 13.0946893788 1259% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -264.83 50.2224549098 -527% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 130.4 11.3001002004 1154% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.59 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 24.01 8.58950901804 280% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 60.0 9.78957915832 613% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 131.2 10.1190380762 1297% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 60.0 10.7795591182 557% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.