Nowadays, females are being recruited in armed forces and security agencies whereas these sort of jobs are traditionally fixed fro male genders. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Nowadays, females are being recruited in armed forces and security agencies whereas these sort of jobs are traditionally fixed fro male genders. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The twenty-first century is not only known well for its innovations but the changes in gender-specific roles can be observed. Nowadays, there is hardly any field in which females are not participating. Are women just supposed to work in the role that generally considers easy? Shouldn't have they equal rights to take part in rough tough jobs? A heated debated has been started on this topic among some groups and I will discuss in this essay why ladies should have equal rights and capabilities to participate in any field.

To begin with, the traditional roles of Intelligence agencies and defense forces, the main participants of war, are not limited to borders and field presences. The dynamics of wars and rules to rule the world are changed entirely as it was considered in past. It is well known that wars, which once were considered fundamental to destroy an enemy, now has taken different directions and moved from grounds to minds. For an instance, now countries with great technology, robust database, innovative spy invents are ruling the world instead of strong forces.

Additionally, women are getting themselves recognized in research and IT field. According to research, females are more innovative and have a greater role in the development of technology than males. This factor makes their participation inevitable in military and security institutes.

To conclude, the modification in the requirements of these institutes roles have not just opened the doors of opportunities for females in forces but their intelligence has made their involvement inevitable.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-12-14 Rehan Yousaf 11 view
Essays by user Rehan Yousaf :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 278, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: Shouldn't
...the role that generally considers easy? Shouldnt have they equal rights to take part in ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...e changed entirely as it was considered in past. It is well known that wars, which onc...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...red in past. It is well known that wars, which once were considered fundamental t...
^^
Line 5, column 74, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'fields'?
Suggestion: fields
...hemselves recognized in research and IT field. According to research, females are mor...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... has made their involvement inevitable.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, well, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1337.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30555555556 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0100690811 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.630952380952 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7864640942 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.846153846 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3846153846 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0757024157268 0.244688304435 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0267455143334 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.029423167504 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0467417134334 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0175367549963 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.