Recently, the phenomenon of garbage production and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the environment is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the conservation of natural resources such as the environment can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, wasting materials can provide the society with some noticeable problems which are rooted in the fact that garbage, as well as air pollution, are inextricably harmful. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the disadvantages of wasting materials on health. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the clean environment and air apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, pollution might increase the bad consequences of being mad and illness. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of removing and annihilation of garbage could be very hard and money consuming. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the improvement of the economy is correlated negatively with garbage production. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of cleanliness.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on rubbish management, I profoundly believe that the cleanliness far outweighs its drawbacks. Not only do the disadvantages of air pollution prove the significance of not production of rubbish, but also pinpoint health implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 249.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68273092369 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40245742142 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.638554216867 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5621873342 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.916666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123679271999 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0407922853451 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041463428463 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0631097110057 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407526488796 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.