Recently, the phenomenon of garbage production and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the environment is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the conservation of natural resources such as the environment can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, wasting materials can provide the society with some noticeable problems which are rooted in the fact that garbage, as well as air pollution, are inextricably harmful. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the disadvantages of wasting materials on health. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the clean environment and air apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, pollution might increase the difficult consequences of being mad and illness. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of removing and annihilation of garbage could be very hard and money consuming. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the improvement of the economy is correlated negatively with garbage production. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of cleanliness.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on rubbish management and clean air, I profoundly believe that the cleanliness far outweighs its drawbacks. Not only do the disadvantages of air pollution prove the significance of not production of rubbish, but also pinpoint health implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.75862068966 295% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 255.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64705882353 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38064691274 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63137254902 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7878924912 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129080291489 0.242375264174 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0412578292153 0.0925447433944 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390891189558 0.071462118173 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0679416293846 0.151781067708 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382477555184 0.0609392437508 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.