World is trembling with human waste and rate of recycling is not in proportionate to the amount of rubbish we are producing. Industrial revolution, over population, heavy consumption of natural resources and fossil fuel are some of many reasons for this mishap. Exponential growth in demography led to increase in service sector and other economic activities. In this essay we will postulate reasons, some solutions and future planning to cross this impediment to the environment.
Twenty first century witnessed sudden surge in construction industry much owing to boom in real estate and urbanisation. In a way to providing shelter to growing population government eased laws relating to land resulting irresponsible demolishing of buildings with no clue to disposal of debris. Delhi is best example of a city suffering from congestion and pollution created by dumping yards. Heaps of waste materials thrown at outskirts are now turned to into mountains causing air contamination to surrounding villages. Sometimes toxic chemicals released into rivers by manufacturing industries and plastics are damaging sensitive ecosystem. Nevertheless, our ways have not changed and with no improvement in our attitude much of these problems will stand unresolved. Let’s have a look to various methods recommended by scientists, international organisations and NGO’s for beneficial outcomes.
Using refurbished materials for constructions and adopting eco friendly products will lessen the burden not only on cost but also yield positive results for modern housings. On the other hand, government bodies can control the garbage production by implementing regulations formulated by United Nations Organisations. Surplus production of plastic should be stopped and special measures should be taken by companies for their disposal. Recently, Indian government launched ‘ Namami Ganges’ project for getting riddance of poisonous chemicals released by leather industries which is giving better results. Public should also use separate bins for throwing domestic and recyclable waste, so that it will be easy for manufacturing recyclable goods. Rural community in Assam is proving this successfully by strict rule of saying ‘no plastic’ and standing example for strong determination. Hill stations like Ooty and Madikere also have stringent policies for waste disposal as their tourism is heavily dependent on clean premises.
In conclusion mankind should wake up about dangers posed by garbage disposal which are on our door steps threatening symbiotic relation with nature. Sooner the better to adopt environmentally friendly methods for protecting mother earth from wrath of this problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 482, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: Twenty-first
...oss this impediment to the environment. Twenty first century witnessed sudden surge in const...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 14, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'century' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'centuries'.
Suggestion: centuries
...iment to the environment. Twenty first century witnessed sudden surge in construction ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 303, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the best'.
Suggestion: is the best
...th no clue to disposal of debris. Delhi is best example of a city suffering from conges...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, look, nevertheless, so, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2294.0 1615.20841683 142% => OK
No of words: 398.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76381909548 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09313524915 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 176.041082164 151% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665829145729 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 704.7 506.74238477 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.5002325569 49.4020404114 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.7 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0904548592964 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0254707581539 0.084324248473 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0261915382306 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0545666249101 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293680061351 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.69 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 154.0 78.4519038076 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.