Nowadays, individual take their families with them to abroad whenever they go on business trip. What are advantages and disadvantages of this on individual and family.
Owing to globalization, international business trips have become popular in the recent time. Many businessmen prefer taking families while having work assignments in different country. This is a positive trend although has some drawbacks which will be discussed in this essay.
On the positive side, knowing the foreign country benefits the family. In other words, when visiting a new country, families learn about the culture, tradition and life-style of people living there, which they can not find in own country. This experience is incredible and adds to the knowledge and wisdom of the person. Consequently, it is worth to travel along with family. Secondly, for the employees who have long onshore assignments can work efficiently when accompanied with family. As the family is with him, he will not feel home-sick, resulting into more focus at job. For instance, my friend got on site in Germany, and as she took her family with her she could stay their for 5 years without worrying about children as they are together.
Another benefit of taking family is about learning foreign language. People spend years to learn foreign language still they cannot learn it because they do not use it frequently. However, if the person moves to country where he need to speak foreign language to communicate, he will definitely get fluent in it because of speaking it often with native people. The Indians in England are known to speak English effectively although they never learned in school is the best example of learning foreign language in foreign land. Thus, it is good for family to get an opportunity to learn different language if they are moving abroad for work.
On the other hand, some people argue that it is costly as the family shifts to other country. According to them, only the person on assignment can complete the work and return, instead of taking the family. Even the organization's funds on sponsoring the family would be saved.
In conclusion, I pen down saying that although the family settlement involves some budget, it is still worthwhile to take the members during the onshore work visits. This would forge the family due to incredible knowledge it gains by knowing the country, and would enable the employee to work efficiently without worrying of family in home country. Thus, for overall benefit of person and the family, it is advisable to visit the new place together.
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing (for example, through cellphone tracking and security cameras). In many cases, the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening.Do you think the advant 84
- Libraries should focus on improving their technological resources rather than in building a large collection of paper books. To what extend do you agree. 84
- Eating too much sugar is harmful for health. Some people think that it is government responsibility to limit people’s sugar consumption while others think that it is individual’s responsibility to limit the amount of sugar they eat. Discuss both views 73
- Many parents think that it is good to teach their children about money Why do you think it is important to teach them the value of money What are the ways that can help children learn about it 61
- You live in a room in college which you share with another student. However, there are many problems with this arrangement and you find it very difficult to work.Write a letter to the accommodation officer at the college. In the letter,• describe the si 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2011.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 399.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04010025063 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61765741185 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513784461153 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 620.1 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.090374097 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7619047619 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2380952381 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216482912975 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651505812944 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366049544034 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126222932625 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0158625135903 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.