Nowadays in many countries women have full time jobs.Therefore, it is logical to share household tasks evenly between men and women.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.
As women empowerment plays an increasingly more central role in most of the countries, it has been suggested that, there has been incline in number of married females working for the family not only for earning money but also respect; hence it is an absolute imperative to share work at home between wife and husband. I completely agree with this assertion, moreover, this trend had already begun in many parts of demographic regions.
Even though, women are earning as par with men, it would be completely preposterous, not to recognize the jobs she is doing behind it such as; looking after in-laws, cooking, preparing children to school, and working for meetings in office. With this tedious work every day she will be exhausted, after coming back to home form a nine-to-five job and again do the routine. On top of that, if she cannot get any support from family, it will be restless to her and will effect her future endeavors, there for the effort of women when compared to men cannot be underestimated.
Nevertheless, a small gesture from family will always encourage her, since, she is working for family. In spite that, sharing work is an interesting trend today; in many doubled salaried families this process of dividing work between husband and wife is normal. In fact, they share the house tasks in days. This approach will hold justice to work share. In previous generation most of the women are not encourage working outside, but now people are more matured in thinking and asking them to work for the benefit of family. So, sharing of work, in stark contrast, is appropriate among both genders.
Despite there is a raise in women employment in many nations, the responsibility of work at home is still debatable. Men should always think that, she is working for better family, and should share his part of house hold task. These small things makes bonding between relation strong and set a good example for future generations
- Some people say that economic development is necessary to reduce the poverty in the world. Others say that economic growth should be stopped immediately to stop damaging the environment. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 73
- Today people are travelling more than ever before.Why is this the case?What are the benefits of travelling for the traveller? 56
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants. Why do you think people waste food? What can be done to reduce the amount of food that throws away? 84
- International marketing is sometimes seen as invasive and an intrusion into the country in question. Others argue that it is a necessary and economical form of education in addition to spreading ideas, language and culture. Discuss both sides and give you 78
- Nowadays food travels thousands of miles before reaching consumers It affects the agriculture and economy of the destination country and for this reason people should prefer food produced by local farmers Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your ans 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 469, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...ly, it will be restless to her and will effect her future endeavors, there for the eff...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 405, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'encouraged'.
Suggestion: encouraged
...us generation most of the women are not encourage working outside, but now people are mor...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 247, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'make'.
Suggestion: make
... of house hold task. These small things makes bonding between relation strong and set...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, in fact, such as, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1622.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9003021148 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58061931019 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567975830816 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.4842347391 49.4020404114 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.857142857 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6428571429 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166341847664 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669021222505 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342499480728 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110584755236 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0088017874886 0.056905535591 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.