In the recent days, young generation tend to delay parenthood. There are number of reasons behind this phenomenon and I propose that it would beget several negative consequences on family life as well as society.
There are three primary reasons why number of individuals decide to have late childbirth. First and foremost, inexperienced people are sorely lacking of social and parenting skills. For instance, in modern society, people don’t have much knowledge about educate and nurture kids. The second reason is rarely had the people who are at early stage of their work can finance their children needs when others don’t have that ability. Therefore, they decide to have babies when they accumulated suffice money. The last one is young people would like to spend their time enjoying their life and travelling. Namely, nowadays a host of young couples plan for their journey when they save enough bucks instead of giving birth.
As a result, this issue can take a toll on households and society. One effect is that this can give rise to woefully inadequate of the amount of workers in the future. One clear example is, Japan’s government have to divert a large of its budget in developing the robot technology and employ intern workers. Due to the shortage of workforce. Another effect is that this may expand the gap between two generations, thus, parents could have difficulties in communicating with their offspring.
In conclusion, there are a plethora of reasons that shed light on the delay of childbirth and therefore is an attributed to devastating impact on family’s qualities and contemporary culture.
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 67
- Nowadays more and more people decide to have children later in their life What are the reasons what are the effects on society and family life 71
- People in many countries are spending less time with their family What are the reasons and effects of this 82
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is it the case What can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 77
- In recent years the family structure has changed as well as the family roles What are the changes that have occurred Do you think these changes are positive or negative 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1368.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16226415094 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6968700131 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622641509434 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.784746604 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236170308374 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643351386386 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513193936768 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112230653552 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0679277579162 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.