Nowadays people are working too hard What is the reason for that What should employers do in order to prevent employees from this

In a modern competitive environment, it has been observed that people work very hard at their workplace. This is mainly because of job insecurity and to meet the company’s goal. There are a number of steps which should be taken by the employers to reduce the workload on employees.

Firstly, the reason most of the employees work very hard for their firms is due to the insecurity of jobs. That is to say, nowadays people are completely aware that if they do not work according to the expectations of the employer, they will be fired immediately and replaced with the new applicant because of the high availability of unemployed, yet skilled people in the market. Secondly, the burden on employees is also owing to the company’s policy of hiring a limited number of employees to run their business. As a result, employees have to work long hours in order to finish the assigned projects before the deadline.

There are two effective solutions to the problem of overburden on employees. One way to tackle this is that employers should provide the latest infrastructure facilities to their workers, which means employees should be provided with up-to-date computers and printers to speed up the work process. For instance, Intel Corporation, an IT Company in the United States, offers robot support to its employees, to minimize their burden, which eventually enhances their efficiency. Another method in reducing the burden on employees is that companies should hire a greater number of employees. This solution would hopefully prevent the workload on a single employee as work will be equally distributed among all the employees.

In conclusion, using the latest equipment and hiring a greater number of employees are effective in dealing with the issue. If employers implemented these solutions, the burden on employees would soon reduce.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'an' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: an; IT
...ocess. For instance, Intel Corporation, an IT Company in the United States, offers ro...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 338, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'companies'?
Suggestion: Companies
... For instance, Intel Corporation, an IT Company in the United States, offers robot supp...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, that is to say

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17666666667 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8806230036 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6661948296 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.928571429 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266185515386 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860363984737 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496340186746 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153133104569 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541996692323 0.056905535591 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.