In recent time, it can be seen that men and women endeavor to create an equilibrium between professional life with other things, however, it could be accomplished by few only. The possible reason is improper routine and the plausible solution is making a time-table of every activity.
The primary reason that why few people are not able to harmonize their work with different things is that they do not have proper mundane. That is to say that, a huge mess has been created without having a structural routine as a person does not know that which tasks should be prioritized. Consequently, neither professional work nor other tasks are done by an individual. For example, a survey in Times of India showed that more that 40% of people do not know that which tasks they have to complete on the next day and because of that, they failed to create equality between work and other things. Therefore, lack of proper planning could be a reason that only some people are able to manage their work with rest of the things in life.
To tackle this problem, several reasonable solutions should be taken into account. Firstly, a manageable time-table should be made by people. Thus, a person could decide that which activity he has to do at a particular time by referring a time-planner. In addition to that, it will not only helpful by indicating the time of work, but also assist to save a lot of time because people will not have to waste their to decide the priorities of various works. To exemplify, a well-known businessman from India said that his secret of success is a proper management of time and he also told that in order to become successful, a person must have a proper time planner. Hence, the issue of imbalance between work and different other things can be solved by making a proper time-table.
In conclusion, the pivotal reason for the dis-harmony amid professional life and other works is lack of proper routine and it could be untangled by making a time-table. Furthermore, it is recommended that people should think wisely before planning any activities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 7.30460921844 260% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1724.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8156424581 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71310593062 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486033519553 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7913471382 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.933333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8666666667 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8666666667 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222630372881 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086742053638 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0800579204509 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145438162886 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452208680978 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.