People's needs increasing show rise and in order to handle this occasion shops working hours and days increased as well. I think that both aspects of view have cons and pons. While it affects the local community, this would be more beneficial for people.
On the one hand, Markets would be more reachable which leads people to but whatever they what at any time of the week or day. Sometimes, there may be some basic needs so people would not be lack of their needs. For Instance, Once, I would go outside and I had to take a shower but I realized that there is no shampoo in the home then I attempt to buy then I recognized that all markets are closed. After a while when the markets extended their working hour I never worried what it missing in-home or whatever else. Thus people would be more relaxed even if stuff is missing in the home.
On the other hand, As the Markets would be popular, Local communities will consider either to shrink their shop or shot them down. Thus, the variety of shops would decrease which are in different locations and closeness was better. Even if small things needed shoppers may have to take a long way to arrive to markets even the way may not be as far as it can be arrived on by walking. For instance, No-one would prefer to buy a small piece of cake from the market that is far away from their home. Thus local communities obviously will be affected by this as they started to shot down people will get in difficulty to reach small things.
Having considered both views, I have come to believe that even though there are some negative sides of extending the working hours, This will provide people to have comfort and calmness.
In conclusion, As long as small communities are not affected by the shops or they are encouraged, pons and cons would be balanced and shopping quality would increase.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 234, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ent locations and closeness was better. Even if small things needed shoppers may have t...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 500, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...arket that is far away from their home. Thus local communities obviously will be aff...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, then, thus, well, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53592814371 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28994946458 2.80592935109 82% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508982035928 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8710689331 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2666666667 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150407506895 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0548721643465 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342153103387 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0983279639293 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281529230119 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 50.2224549098 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 12.4159519038 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.