Since technology has increasingly become or part of our life, most people try to benefit from all of its features such as the use of translating a text in an online platform. In this essay, I will discuss why the pros outweigh the cons.
First of all, using all those types of applications make people more likely to be lazy because of their availability and ease of reachability. Therefore, they do not enhance their language knowledge as they relied on apps. Due to the fact that they are not engaged with the language, this leads students to be lack of language, especially it is noticeable on speaking ability. For instance, nowadays, people have trouble learning English because of the use of a translation app that avoids people to learn deeply. Thus, less ambition to learn the language which will put them in difficulty will be an inevitable fact.
The ones who make use of the advantages of technology benefits from it extensively. Firstly, having easy translation enable students to harvest knowledge from a different source which may be hard for students to translate it in a conversational way. Moreover, they can use it both their education or profession life. For instance, applications help students, those who write an essay or doing some research for presentation, to reach more reliable sources rather than just being imperative to get from their own language resources.
Having considered both advantages and disadvantages, I have come to believe that even there are some cons about the use of those apps, the pros cannot be overlooked, which are far outnumbered the cons, which facilities people's life such as enlarging different perceives and seeing different perspectives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 227, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a conversational way" with adverb for "conversational"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ay be hard for students to translate it in a conversational way. Moreover, they can use it both their e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for instance, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13620071685 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92978690166 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594982078853 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.3287952266 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.416666667 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244274840324 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808252838731 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052446818275 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142007587356 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0110116403034 0.056905535591 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.