Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish.
Why do you think this is happening?
What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced?
Recently, I read an article about the prevalence of throwaway society. The author highlights many factors for it, but in this essay, I will discuss the main reasons and suggest some possible solutions.
Let us start with the reasons why human beings are generating much refuse. The first reason is that most citizens have low self-discipline. Many residents have developed the habits inherent to throwaway society, where people consume everything with the carelessness to the environment. Another reason is that fines for littering no longer correspond to the damage. People tend to ignore laws, which are designed to protect the environment from dumping garbage, because the punishment is negligibly low. Furthermore, it happens due to widespread use of disposable packaging. The majority of city dwellers cannot image their lives without purchasing and keeping products in plastic bags, so they intensively use and get rid of them in household.
However, people can deal with the disposal of garbage by adopting the following measures. Firstly, authorities should increase relevant fines. Both to compensate the damage to the environment and deter people from dumping rubbish, officials should toughen the legislation regarding littering. Secondly, it can launch clean-up campaigns in society. To eliminate the existing throwaway society, authorities should show the importance of preserving nature by encouraging people to clean the streets of rubbish and stop leaving rubbish in cities. Moreover, it should encourage people to switch to the use of reusable packaging. Governments should discourage citizens from the use of plastic bags and show the benefits of using reusable bags, so that people will quit the habit of using disposable packaging.
In conclusion, although there are many reasons why people throw more garbage, it is possible to tackle this problem by taking the above mentioned measures.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | daly.shaker.99@gmail.com | 95 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | camp.vandna@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | camp.vandna@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-11 | Ankita7443 | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-15 | priteshshah16 | 56 | view |
- Some people think the best way to solve global environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- Many people believe that having a fixed punishment for all crimes is more efficien.What are the advantages and disadvantages of having a fixed punishment? 61
- A serious problem affecting countries right across the globe is the lack of water for drinking washing and other household uses Why do many countries face water shortages and what could be done to alleviate the problem 84
- For some people shopping is not just about buying what is necessary, but a form of entertainment. Do you think it is a positive or a negative development? 90
- In many countries, very few people read newspapers or follow the news on TV.What do you think are the causes of this?What solutions can you suggest? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56655290102 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86751984072 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59385665529 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.4338648642 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9411764706 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2352941176 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17647058824 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0822814857529 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.024589754647 0.084324248473 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0306241874562 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0526424577033 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349402308339 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.73 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.