Violence in the media promotes violence in society.
To what extent do you agree?
Mass media plays an important role in the public. However, some community workers argue that is cruel episodes in media can encourage members of society to act abnormally. This essay disagrees with their point of view.
Let us start with the reasons why sociologist think that cruel scenes in media cause violence in society. The first cause is that young people take the atrocity on TV for granted. Scenes of violence may convince the youth to believe that assaulting others is normal in society. Another argument is that it encourages some parents to abuse their children. Watching how parents ruthlessly treat families on TV shows may motivate people to act the same against their household members. Furthermore, the fear of being violated as the victims of cruelty on mass media may encourage people to carry weapons as a measure of self-defense. After watching violent scenes on television, people may want to protect themselves as well as their relatives by either guns or knives, but this redundant protection may tempt the owners to use it in unserious situations.
However, some media presenters advocate the idea the effect of violence on TV screens is exaggerated by sociologists. First of all, there are other sources of violence in life. Cruel behaviour originates from everything, since it is part of human nature, so media shows brutal conduct, but may have a low psychological effect in comparison to other sources of information. Secondly, well-bred people tend to avoid watching programs encouraging cruelty. Mentally stable people usually prefer to resolve disagreements peacefully no matter whether they watch TV programs narrating violent stories. Finally, violent behavior described in media can teach audience what is unacceptable in health society. Some young people, for instance, are unaware of what abnormal behavior is in the public; however, such shows can enlighten them about it.
In conclusion, although some social workers believe that cruelty displayed on sources of information cause atrocious behavior in real world, I think that cruelty can occur regardless of what is highlighted on media outlets.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-19 | avneet28 | 56 | view |
| 2022-12-27 | lokeshpareek87 | 78 | view |
| 2022-04-21 | being | 56 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | mohammed123 | 56 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | mohammed123 | 56 | view |
- All over the world societies are facing a growing problem with obesity This problem affects both children and adults What are the reasons for this rise in obesity 84
- What are the pros and cons for children of watching television? 73
- In some cities and towns all over the world, the high volume of traffic is a problem. What are the causes of this and what actions can be taken to solve this problem? 73
- With a growing population, many people believe that we should focus on more genetically modified foods. What are the advantages and disadvantages of doing this? 67
- You have a Facebook friend living in another country and he is curious to learn about a major news item in your country.Write a letter to your Facebook friend. In your letterdescribe a news story in your countryexplain why people are interested in itsay h 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1807.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34615384615 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79707246407 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568047337278 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2124399821 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.388888889 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168128681989 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058238579757 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649484598532 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0949492528874 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397755137584 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.