Nowadays weddings are becoming bigger and more expensive Why is it happening Is it a negative or a positive development

In modern era, organising wedding at extravaganza level has become new trend. Although there are certain benefits of lavish ceremonies, a plethora of drawbacks over weigh those merits. I profoundly believe that this negative development is being done by high-level weddings which is conveyed in forthcoming paragraphs.
To commence with, wedding is the mean through which two persons are going to embark their new lives together. Therefore, to make it more memorable, individuals organise multiple functions at different venues such as outdoor cocktail party, indoor banquet hall for other ceremonies etcetera. Moreover, it is a great day and may be only the time when all friends and families gather together to celebrate your happiness. As everyone has busy schedules and it is extensively intricate to gather all favourites in one place at one time. In addition to this, cultural weddings always promote the traditions to next generation. In light of this fact, people generally do not bother about expenditures and cherish all the spectacular events.
On the contrary, weddings require enormous amount of money. Consequently, people are forced to spend their lifetime savings and there are some cases when people take loans from friends as well as banks to bear the expenses. To exemplify, middle class as well as low class families often struggle with arranging opulence to spend on their children’s wedding due to the society pressure or because of family traditions. Moreover, the savings can be alternatively put towards for buying house or building the career. Even, it has been witnessed that people who take an exorbitant amount of loans, generally combat with financial problems for long periods. Besides this, people are too focused in hosting functions that they usually forget to celebrate the true essence of the event.
To recapitulate, nevertheless wedding is once a life-time event and it should be celebrated to the fullest but spending affluence is not going to provide felicity rather cause more financial burdens to the newly married couple which has been proved by above discussed facts.

Votes
Average: 9 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 271, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'ceremonies'' or 'ceremony's'?
Suggestion: ceremonies'; ceremony's
...il party, indoor banquet hall for other ceremonies etcetera. Moreover, it is a great day a...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, in addition, such as, as well as, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1787.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33432835821 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7968795265 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644776119403 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6846485018 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.6875 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9375 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1875 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103818342628 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0332705999933 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416303115211 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.069073840891 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431784010514 0.056905535591 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.