The number of TV programs is growing day by day Some people say it is good as it gives people more choices while others say it affects the quality of TV programs Discuss both the views and give your opinion

Television programs are good for families, and families, over time, have been watching programs on TV. The number of TV programs are increasing daily, and some people say is good as it gives people more choices while others say it affect the quality of TV programs. In this essay I will discuss how daily growth of the number of TV programs is good as it gives more choices, and how it affects the quality of TV programs.

On the one hand, day to day growth of the amount of TV programs is good because it gives more choices. The reason is that there are varieties of programs to watch, so this leaves us with options to choose from. For instance, DSTV has over 700 channels, and almost all of them show different programs. We have have different opinions, right? Clearly, the increasing number of TV programs is good as it gives more choices.

On the other hand, the daily increase of the amount of TV programs affects the quality of Television programs. This is affected because there will be too many similar programs. For example, we have a lot of programs on sports, but not all will meet the quality requirements needed for TV programs. Therefore, the quality of Television programs is affected by the day to day increase of the number of TV programs.

In conclusion, I have discussed how daily growth of the number of TV programs is good as it gives more choices, and how it affects the quality of TV programs. In my opinion, the daily increase in the number of TV programs is good because everyone must encounter a program that will interest them.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 232, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'affects'?
Suggestion: affects
...people more choices while others say it affect the quality of TV programs. In this ess...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 305, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: have
...all of them show different programs. We have have different opinions, right? Clearly, the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 310, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...f them show different programs. We have have different opinions, right? Clearly, the...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1288.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6164874552 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52196323473 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 176.041082164 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.379928315412 0.561755894193 68% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 384.3 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3125638916 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.514375999203 0.244688304435 210% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.219486927778 0.084324248473 260% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.176882328557 0.0667982634062 265% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.36262521096 0.151304729494 240% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124207253466 0.056905535591 218% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 12.4159519038 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.67 8.58950901804 78% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 78.4519038076 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.