IN THE PAST, MANY PEOPLE HAD SKILLS SUCH AS MAKING THEIR OWN CLOTHES AND DOING REPAIRS TO THINGS IN THE HOUSE. IN MANY COUNTRIES, SKILLS LIKE THESE ARE DISAPPEARING.
-WHY DO YOU THINK THIS CHANGE IS HAPPENING.
-HOW FAR IS THIS SITUATION TRUE IN YOUR COUNTRY.
Owing to the advancement in science technology, the traditional skills of people are diminishing. The availability of technical machines and the lack of experience among the new generation has lead to the disappearance of arts of ancestors such as hand-made clothes and, building and repairing of household items.
To embark on, there are numerous factors responsible for this burgeoning trend. The first and foremost is the development of a wide range of machinery which helps to carry out the work in fractions of time and more accurately. As a result, modern technology is prefered in comparison to manual efforts to produce better and effective results and at a faster rate. For instance, in the earlier years of the nineteenth century, people used to produce khadi cloth manually which took a minimum thirty days for preparation. It was huge investment of time and labour at that time, however, nowadays the advents of technical devices have made the process of production much easier.
Another crucial factor is the lack of inherited knowledge and experience. In other words, today's young generation does not hold the proficiency to fix the minor defects in the household items, this is because the skills are usually not taught to the growing children which make them unskilled in these areas. In addition, the specialised technicians are available for every repair work which lead to the least interest of youngsters to learn these skills.
Considering the situation in my country, although modern technology has influenced the major parts of the nation, there are some exceptionally backward areas where manual work still persist. For instance, the Tehri place in the west of Rajasthan is the place where technology has not reached yet and people living there used to wear hand-made clothes and knitted sweaters. Moreover, there is no availability of repair shops in that particular area. Conversely, the metropolitan cities are blessed with industries, skilled professionals, high-tech machines where every task is done technically.
In conclusion, it can be stated that the surge in modernization and industrialization has disappeared the traditional manual art of making clothes and repairing things. While this phenomenon has taken over the major portion of my country, there are some places where manual work exists.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-09 | Prabhjot Kaur Bhullar | 84 | view |
- In many countries, it is now illegal to smoke in public places. It is only fair that people who wish to smoke should have to leave the building. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their own countries. What are the reasons? What are the solutions to change negative attitudes? 73
- People today do not feel safe either at home or when they are out. What are the causes? What solutions can you suggest? 89
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both views and gi 78
- Rich countries should help poorer countries when they suffer natural disasters.Do you agree or disagree? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, however, moreover, so, still, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1985.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37940379404 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97523457387 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563685636856 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4205891146 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0625 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0625 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122390877709 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0380419048382 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.030053965807 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0713225553208 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237829404429 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.