People aim to achieve a balance between their work and lives, but few achieve it. What are the causes of this problem? How to overcome it?
Although achieving a work-life balance has always been the all-time goal of many white collars, the number of people who can actually maintain that idea is limited. While there are several reasons accounting for why this situation happens, I would agree that society and government might take steps to mitigate these potentials.
On the one hand, it is no doubt true that leading-edge technology has revolutionized the modes of people’s lifework, which allows white collars to work remotely and still get tasks done instead of having to stay presently on-site in a nine-to-five job. This would act as a precursor for employers to make the most use of their employees’ workforce, requiring them to keep working for extra hours even after they finish their official workday hours. For instance, some managers might assign tasks to be accomplished during the weekends in case of an emergency. Therefore, if this situation persists in the long term, workers will be swayed into hectic dead-end schedules, consequently forgetting to invest their rest hours to relax and recharge, which is contrary to the definition of balancing between work and life.
Nevertheless, there are some more effective and practical measures that should be considered to handle this problem from the government’s perspective. Firstly, governance policies might be adopted, which set limited working hours per week. This will restrict the citizens from working overtime and will be fined if violating. Secondly, policymakers should launch campaigns to raise their inhabitants’ awareness regarding the detrimental influences that happen to overworked people’s physical and mental health, which undoubtedly can lead to stress and other life-threatening conditions. As a result, these people would be more conscious about how long they work and avoid consistent hours of work.
In conclusion, it might seem sensible to me that the proliferation of technological development should be held accountable for this unbalanced work-life situation, and there are other substantial ways to address this issue from a societal level.
- It is believed that everyone should become vegetarian To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Nowadays genetically modified food is widespread all over the world While proponents of GM crops ensure that these foods are safe for human consumption and help to increase food supplies others argue that their effects on health have not been studied long 89
- People aim to achieve a balance between their work and lives but few achieve it What are the causes of this problem How to overcome it 89
- More people than ever before are traveling to other countries now Why Is this a positive or negative development 78
- The increasing use of mobile phones and computer has had a negative effect on young people s writing and reading skills Do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, consequently, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1785.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52631578947 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03271594858 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637770897833 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.1971369515 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.75 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9166666667 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.8333333333 7.06120827912 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207864348871 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717572390195 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432954069753 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118305998291 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270794605064 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.