More people than ever before are traveling to other countries now. Why? Is this a positive or negative development?
It is an inescapable fact that the number of people traveling abroad has increased surprisingly in recent years. I would agree that there are numerous reasons for this trend, which might have some positive impacts on social development.
On the one hand, I would believe that there are both technological and social factors that account for this change. The strongest argument is that in light of the proliferation of cutting-edge technology, aviation development has made airfare much cheaper than ever before. Therefore, not only affluent people can afford the travel cost but also common ones can be able to bear the expense of traveling. Besides, along with economic progression, the standards of living have been witnessed a remarkably exponential growth. This would undeniably lead to the situation that demand for entertaining as well as relaxation increases, facilitating people to place more and more emphasis on travel.
On the other hand, this phenomenon could have beneficial impacts in terms of both society and economic perspective. First, it is true without a doubt that traveling helps people to be able to get a closer insight into many different cultures that enlightens horizon-broadening experience. This would definitely give people opportunities to have a multi-dimensional outlook on life, acting as a precursor to comprehensive personal development. Second, the tourism industry expands dramatically over the past few years, being a contributor to many countries’ economic development. For instance, in the last 3 years, Vietnam has earned significant revenue that comes from the traveling industry, which is recently reported that accounts for approximately 10% of total GDP.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that the advances in aviation and economic development contribute to the rise of traveling, which can exert positive effects for the aforementioned reasons.
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language Do you think this is a positive or negative social development 78
- In many countries plastic containers have become more popular than ever They are used in many businesses such as food and drink industry Do you think the advantages outweigh its disadvantages 84
- Cars damage the environment and their use is increasing Why How can this be controlled 89
- Richer countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid To what extend do you agree or disagree 89
- In many cities the use of video cameras in public places is becoming more popular but some people are against these measures Do the benefits of CCTV outweigh its drawbacks 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...positive impacts on social development. On the one hand, I would believe that th...
^^^
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...to be able to get a closer insight into many different cultures that enlightens horizon-broade...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 771, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nts for approximately 10% of total GDP. In conclusion, I am of the opinion that ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, look, second, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1610.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53264604811 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24102899745 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611683848797 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.7725333642 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 123.846153846 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4615384615 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226649642576 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702759994787 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420055917624 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124071134514 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428656975517 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.