Being outside has become more attractive to people as the opportunities spread out. Although there are some people who suggest to have a constitutional rule to restrict youngesters to go out, some laud its inconvenience and disadvantages. In my opinion, restrictions always have drawbacks especially for the youth so that let the young people decide whether to go out late hours would be better in many aspect of views.
For those who claim that limitation for going out has to be exist present reasonable perspectives. Firstly, notoriously, midnight is the most dangerous hour of day. Therefore, When the youngesters face with the hazardous situtation they will more likely to be vulnerable so that they cannot protect themselves,Indees, they can be hurt. Keeping them away from going out with law will benefit and they will not be no longer in danger. For example, even though in my country such a law does not exist, because of our tradation adolescent are not allowed to go out so that the offence to under 18 the least in comparison with any other countries according to researches. Such rule will certainly keep the youngesters away from danger, as well as provide families with not thinking of their children, since they will be with their parents instead outside.
On the other hand, for those who think oppositely about above stateme also show undeniable facts. First of all, young people can learn life reality which would be useful for them. Thus, they will have vast perspections of life and whenever they face with difficulties they can find solution to overcome it. For instance, my friends used to hang out midnights, In contrast i am not allowed to do so, while they can easily handle their problem, i can not because i am not experienced as much as they are. As such, early starting to life always put you one step forward because it prepares you any of trouble and give you chance to learn how to approach the occasions.
Having considered both, I have come to believe, avoiding them by law is short-terms protection, whereas that letting youngesters live as they wish enable them to enhance their knowledge about life which enables them to save them in the future occasions which may crucial.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggest having'.
Suggestion: suggest having
...out. Although there are some people who suggest to have a constitutional rule to restrict young...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 400, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun aspect seems to be countable; consider using: 'many aspects'.
Suggestion: many aspects
...to go out late hours would be better in many aspect of views. For those who claim that l...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 310, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Indees
...e so that they cannot protect themselves,Indees, they can be hurt. Keeping them away fr...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 206, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eful for them. Thus, they will have vast perspections of life and whenever they f...
^^
Line 5, column 374, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...used to hang out midnights, In contrast i am not allowed to do so, while they can...
^
Line 5, column 445, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...e they can easily handle their problem, i can not because i am not experienced as...
^
Line 5, column 463, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...handle their problem, i can not because i am not experienced as much as they are....
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, while, as to, for example, for instance, in contrast, as well as, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1847.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 376.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91223404255 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76428831594 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574468085106 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.5009021773 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.133333333 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0666666667 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9333333333 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226843913126 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0826695743357 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513192425103 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130002308741 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0781671511443 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.