people are using more online language translating apps. are the advantages are more than disadvantages for these services
In this contemporary era, apps play an imperative role in our life. Some people use these apps to translate language. The drawback seems to be exiguous compared to the benefits of these apps.
On the one side, due to the recent globalization, many people travel to different nations to study, trade and to see their local culture. In this world every nation has their unique language. For example, In India, every state has its own language like Telugu in Andhra pradesh and Tamil in Tamilnadu. So, in order to create a flow of information these apps form a bridge. Additionally these apps erase the boundaries between nations. In other words, as these online translators ease the way they communicate can help nations to know each other and able to share knowledge and to business. These apps intern boost the economy of the nations, as more people around the world can easily travel to other nations to explore their culture as for tourists one of the main hurdle is language.
On the other hand, these online translators need internet connection in order to work. So, these online translators cannot be useful in remote locations. Apart from that, sometimes the meaning of the translated sentence may not be correct, as some languages have words which have different meaning depending upon the context they are used.
In conclusion, these apps which translate language have both merits and demerits. However it is irrefutable from the above argument that, the benefits clearly outweigh the drawbacks as they increase the chance to study, trade and also boost the economy of nations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-14 | Hassan Riaz | 73 | view |
- Your child is going on a trip to another country for 3 days. School is looking for some parents who can join the trip and you decided to apply for the same. You are interested in going with trip. Write a letter to the head of the school and include:•Why 73
- A friend you made while you were studying abroad has written to ask you for help in finding a job in your country. You have heard about a job in a local company that might be suitable for him/her. Write a letter to this friend. In your letter:Tell your fr 89
- The growth of online shopping will one day lead to all the shops in town and cities closing. Do you agree or dis agree? 56
- Most people prefer ready to eat food than home-made food now. Do you think it has more advantages or more disadvantages. 61
- Some people believe that children should do what their parents tell them to do others think children must learn to think for themselves Discuss both views and give your own opinion 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 374, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Additionally,
...f information these apps form a bridge. Additionally these apps erase the boundaries between...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 83, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...language have both merits and demerits. However it is irrefutable from the above argume...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, apart from, as for, for example, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1348.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08679245283 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55122249227 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558490566038 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.1954402533 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8666666667 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257052766107 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873555236773 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717060262742 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146136511875 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408096582197 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.