Some people argue that those who is into high-risk sport should take responsibility for their own safeness and lives and a rescue team should not take a risk trying to save them. As far as I am concerned, I somewhat agree with this opinion; however I believe that rescuers are doing their job and it is right to help everyone including people doing unsafe sports activities.
On one side of the argument, there are people who believe that rescue teams should not save people who put their lives in danger intentionally during extreme sport activities. This is because they probably believe that if a person is doing something dangerous for their lives, them should be aware what level of risk it is and take complete responsibility for their own lives and health. Otherwise, they may neglect the danger and take unjustified risk. A good illustration of this opinion is that the most climbers hiking to Everest would never try to save lives of climbers who does not have enough oxygen or is in any kind of trouble.
On other hand, rescue workers are conceivably people who save lives of people who is in trouble because of any unforeseen circumstances. In addition, rescue teams are usually fully equipped and totally aware of potential risks related to their job. As well as they are highly trained professionals who is ready for emergency and the worst-case scenario. For example, I cannot accept the fact that people passing by dying people on the Everest and are not trying to help them. From my point of view it is cruel to choose whether someone deserves to be save whether not.
In conclusion, both sides of the argument have their merits, on balance however I agree that rescuers should try to help everyone without exception because it is what to be a human being.
- Nowadays young people know less about traditions and culture than in the past What are the reasons for it Is this a positive or negative development 65
- Write a letter to the organiser of an annual festival that you attended last year Include Feedback about last year An offer to volunteer Questions about the festival 56
- Many high street shops have gone out of business in recent years Why do you think this has happened Is it a positive or negative development 85
- In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn. 78
- In many countries women and men are working full time It is therefore logical for women and men to share household tasks To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 327, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[9]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to include' or 'include'.
Suggestion: to include; include
...ir job and it is right to help everyone including people doing unsafe sports activities. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 639, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gh oxygen or is in any kind of trouble. On other hand, rescue workers are concei...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 47, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'peopled'.
Suggestion: peopled
...er hand, rescue workers are conceivably people who save lives of people who is in trou...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...because it is what to be a human being.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79220779221 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56996055433 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503246753247 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.3954843569 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375596530576 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135868564742 0.084324248473 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105926472232 0.0667982634062 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241903711695 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104024973147 0.056905535591 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.