A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
The worth of a person in the society has changed over the years due to the shift in values. A higher degree of attention is paid on one's social reputation and how much wealth we flaunt in the modern city compared to virtues. I agree with this opinion to a large extent and would further give you an insight as to why I choose to believe that the society is highly materialistic?
To begin with, living in a consumer driven community is the main cause that contributes to the prevalence of judging others by what they have. The higher living standard enables people to afford buying high-valued goods or even luxurious handbags and designer's branded clothes. they are taken as a symbol of social status which the more you own, the more valued you are. A good illustration of this is that there is an abundance of designer clothes, accessories in India with exclusive showrooms catering to foreign products ranging from Gucci, Prada, louis Viton and these brands are exorbitantly charged amounting to millions of rupees. The high demand for such items only makes the Indian market a favourable hub for all leading world designers
Meanwhile, A person who has money, style and class is literally worshipped but at the same time a modestly dressed though a well-educated even a University topper, May meet a lot of ridicule by the society at large that’s why of late there is mad rush for image consultants, style consultants, etiquette classes, personality development classes etc. for example, each and every rich mogul is so bothered about their social status and their image that they fail to show profound concern towards environmental causes or social causes. Although they may end up showing superficial concerns for such causes as a publicity gimmick
To conclude, there is no doubt that the value in judging one's worth has been differentiated from the past when people emphasize more on consumer products and follow the new social standards. Despite the fact that it is a sad truth, this phenomenon will gradually continue under the development of materialism and social media.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to buy'.
Suggestion: to buy
...iving standard enables people to afford buying high-valued goods or even luxurious han...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...handbags and designers branded clothes. they are taken as a symbol of social status ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (May) must be used with a third-person verb: 'meets'.
Suggestion: meets
...-educated even a University topper, May meet a lot of ridicule by the society at lar...
^^^^
Line 5, column 355, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es, personality development classes etc. for example, each and every rich mogul i...
^^
Line 7, column 58, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...e is no doubt that the value in judging ones worth has been differentiated from the ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, well, while, as to, for example, no doubt, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1748.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98005698006 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74133890683 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612535612536 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 106.164070746 49.4020404114 215% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 158.909090909 106.682146367 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.9090909091 20.7667163134 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172181039764 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636593820015 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037230011453 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100763895722 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313398851158 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.