A person's worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
The worldly era have laid a solid foundation in the superficial judgement of people towards the worth of one individual. Social status and material possession seems to become the first norm to evaluate one person on value scale while the traditional values are opted as further even none consideration. I totally disagree with the viewpoint
On the one hàn, it is inevitable that people are judged by the social hierachies and worldly goods. To begin with, the enhancement in gaps among several status entwined in advanced country make the norm become more evident and reasonable than ever. By contrast, these two factors are not the sole ones to be considered on one's worthy scale. The value of one individual is also based on social experience, achievement or social contributions.
On the other hand, tradition is the core àn basic norm to judge the value of one person. The material possession standards may suit the presence world but they are likely to change and unstable, old-fashioned in the new era with the mushgrowing of new factores. Secondly, from social perspective, conventional value are perfect stepping stone to facilitate the society to the flourishing and cilization.
In conclusion, there is no doubt the prevalence of the material standards. The old-fashioned values are also important,
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-14 | emilju | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | HarleyDao. | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-08 | kushal kushal | 61 | view |
| 2019-05-26 | mary nabil | 56 | view |
| 2019-04-23 | Jency Paul | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun status seems to be countable; consider using: 'several statuses'.
Suggestion: several statuses
...gin with, the enhancement in gaps among several status entwined in advanced country make the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in gaps among several status entwined in advanced country make the norm become mo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, may, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, no doubt, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1106.0 1615.20841683 68% => OK
No of words: 212.0 315.596192385 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21698113208 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98150149968 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 176.041082164 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608490566038 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6405326314 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.545454545 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2727272727 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.90909090909 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175234819798 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688392903054 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389492174563 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116421552378 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285843338402 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.