Police in some countries like in England don’t carry guns. Some do not approve of this because they think that police with guns gives them security. Others think that police carrying guns decreases crimes. What is your opinion?
In view of increasing the crimes in most countries, debate has started whether police should carry the weapons or not. Some people do not advocate this idea as these guns overprotect the police whereas other people believe that presence of guns with police deter the crimes. I believe that police should be fully equipped to handle any kind of situation.
People who believe that carrying guns are not necessary for police have some valid points. First of all, use of weapons makes the situation worse in most of the cases. It has been observed that ordinary situation which could have handled in simpler way, got complicated owing to the use of guns. Consequently, there were loss of life and social unrest. For example, recent incidents where police shoot the innocent black people for delinquencies which led nationwide protest over killing. Secondly, police carrying guns implicitly deliver the message that guns are required for being safe. Some follow this message and start keeping the guns for personal use which raise the crime in society. Finally, possessing the weapons gives authority to police to use it at their discretion. Especially in U.S, it was found that police used the weapons considering as last medium to resolve the conflict and other approaches were discarded.
However, increasing crimes clearly make the case for police to carry the weapon. Nowadays, criminals have advanced weapons and do not hesitate to use in public. It is required for police to retaliate in the same way to handle the situation and protect the people. For instance, in African countries, weapons are easily available in black market and criminals use it for different kinds of crime. Furthermore, terrorism is on its peak and deadly terrorist attacks are taking place in the world. For counter terrorism, police must be equipped and trained to respond the emergency situation.
To conclude, certainly it is not good for anyone to have weapons in civilized society but situation has worsened and increasing crimes and terrorism drives police to carry guns and protect people in best possible manner.
- The tendency of human being to copy one another is shown in the popularity of fashion clothes and consumer goods. To what extent do you agree? 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.You should write at least 150 words.Your car is hired from a company and while you are driving on holiday, you have a small accident. You will have to write a report to the company to explain it. In your lett 89
- Techno Corporation is our top pick for the investment this term. We urge all our clients to invest in this new company. For the first time in ten years, a company that has developed a satellite technology has been approved by the FTA to compete with curre 50
- A friend (Ms Sara) of yours is going on holiday soon and has asked you to recommend a destination.Write a letter to your friend and recommend a good place for a holiday that you have visited before. Say where you went, where you stayed, what you can do th 78
- Write a letter to a friend to ask for his/her help to collect money for a charity organization. The letter needs to cover the following details.- why do you want to collect money for the charity organization?- Ask your friend to help- explain in detail ho 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 799, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...it at their discretion. Especially in U.S, it was found that police used the weap...
^
Line 7, column 197, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the best'.
Suggestion: in the best
...police to carry guns and protect people in best possible manner.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, whereas, for example, for instance, kind of, first of all, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1767.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15160349854 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54165879093 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527696793003 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5701238885 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0526315789 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26315789474 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27164650494 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0945598637548 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879607266352 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190165704848 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0848667973999 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.