In the contemporary era, some countries consisting of more young population. There is a commonly held belief that the development of these communities is vitally manifold. Although, there are a number of drawbacks in these countries, Admittedly, I believe that the benefits are by no means negligible.
To begin with, the most rational justification is the elderly invaluable experiences which can help us in various aspects of our life. That is to say, they are more educated teachers who are trimming with live and practical courses. They can transmit whatever they see and achieve to us. A good illustration is parents that show the right way to their children and teach them how to face difficulties such as financial problems and manage life stress and tension. The rate of crime, furthermore, is less in communities with aged people. Evidence shows that societies with a large number of old people are safer. To put it differently, the elderly prefer to rest fellow their life and do not interested in risky and dangerous activities in comparison to youngsters.
On the other hand, the profits of countless young adults in a country are inevitable. The most axiomatic argument is that the youngsters have more energy to work especially on sensitive projects. Simply put, their motivation to search and find cutting edge technologies which show their risky power are extremely manifold. Take the computer programmers who are always trying to learn new techniques and use them in their programs compared to their managers who just want to keep previous codes as an example. This in turn demonstrates the old people secure incentives. Furthermore, old people have expenses for the community. That is, the older the retires become, the more suffer diseases that are due to weakening the immune system. Accordingly, the government should provide free health services and insurance for them which is much costly.
To sum up, the young population in a country has both pros and cons. While elderly experiences lead society to be a safer place to live, It seems that younger's work causes economic and technological development which is more crucial.
- SOME PEOPLE SAY THAT THE BEST WAY TO IMPROVE PUBLIC HEALTH IS BY INCREASING THE NUMBER OF SPORTS FACILITIES OTHERS HOWEVER SAY THAT THIS WOULD HAVE LITTLE EFFECT ON PUBLIC HEALTH AND THAT OTHER MEASURES ARE REQUIRED DISCUSS BOTH VIEWS AND GIVE YOUR OWN 73
- Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today s society To what extent do you agree with this view 61
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both these vi 78
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do you think that the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 84
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 572, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ple. Evidence shows that societies with a large number of old people are safer. To put it differe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, furthermore, if, so, while, such as, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1802.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1339031339 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87372747345 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60113960114 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2515923244 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.55 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151642072119 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0458220495754 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543766705636 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0832886548778 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0157066214331 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.