Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no special knowledge of the following topic News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers What factors do you think influence these decisions Do we become

Essay topics:

Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no special knowledge of the following topic:
News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. What factors do you think influence these decisions? Do we become used to bad news? Would it be better if more good news was reported?
Use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.

News is one of the most important part of the society which helps to update people about what is happening in the world. Although news could be either be printed or may be broadcasted through media, while the authenticity of the news should not be pulled down. Nowadays, the news has been influenced by the news editor and presented it to the community to get more attention from the end-users. But sadly, this kind of alteration is creating major harm to society.
There are a plethora of reasons for the same. Firstly, news editors end up changing the news because of personal and political reasons. Although there might be some truth behind the story, unless there is some personal or political reason involved, the news will not be altered to present it to the community. For instance, if someone from the media has spotted a politician getting bribed, they will make a huge headline. This will in turn spoil the image of the politician in front of the society. To avoid this, a lot of threats will be passed to the news editors due to which under the threat influence the media will have to alter the content and then present it to the world. The authenticity of the news has gone down the drain.
In addition, as the news needs to be really captivating, it is extremely easy for people to look up to the news with problems over to the news with some achievements. As the news editor knows the trick, they try and alter all the good news with the rephrased headlines to catch one’s attention. To illustrate this topic, the media would highlight the news like the Prime Minister is using the tax money for his own benefits. As this is a negative headline, the reader will first have a look through this and then try to read the content to understand the real reason behind the headline.
On the whole, it would be better if the news presented on the media or printed in the newspaper could have more authenticity and could be reported correctly in its true form. This will help the community to understand the issues going on in the current world. News editors should understand that spreading the good news would help the community to fight against the problem rather than using the bad news to captivate one’s attention.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-01-02 mehjabin 61 view
2021-09-06 krimikap 73 view
2021-09-06 krimikap 67 view
2021-09-06 Maulik Mody 84 view
2021-09-06 krimikap 73 view
Essays by user krimikap :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
...s the news editor knows the trick, they try and alter all the good news with the rephra...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 513, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
...first have a look through this and then try and read the content to understand the real...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, look, may, really, so, then, while, for instance, in addition, kind of, on the whole

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1840.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 397.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63476070529 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46283982656 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460957178841 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5038312489 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.222222222 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0555555556 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05555555556 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137267091758 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0467533145462 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364901963699 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0959306462168 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243705373812 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 50.2224549098 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 12.4159519038 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.