Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There has been a colossal upsurge in discussing whether the rich countries should or shouldn't subsidize the aid for the developing countries. With the economic assistance from developed countries, in some circumstances, there is no positive transition in tackling poverty in developing country. While there are many debatable opinion about this phenomenon, I personally give a green light to the statement which assume developed countries should give other types of help to the others rather than financial facet.
On the one hand, a support in terms of economic, finance,.. from developed nations plays a pivotal role for the improvement of the poor countries. Firstly, the government in these nations can get by the expense for the underlying standard such as education, healthcare service, etc. Secondly, thriving for mitigating poverty is not an unproblematic activity because it requires many elements from the resident in these nations. Each individual in the developing should raise their awareness about the situation of their own country and contribute their efforts to ease this social phenomenon. Without it, the country hardly to get out of this zone and the condition may be worse. Thirdly, there are some loopholes in the government system such as the embezzlement and fraudulent which make the cash is not served for their right purpose.
On the other hands, I believe that there are a range of determining factors except for financial aid that can make help the unindustrialized nations reduce their poverty level. To be clear, instead of subsidize the money for these nations, the government in rich countries can support any programs which repel some problems like illiteracy, addiction to drugs, etc. For instance, in the widespread of the Covid-19, the US nations and other developed nations willing to give the vaccines for the countries who are not able to purchase those. This activity can make sure that the habitants in unindustrialized nations have enough vaccine to deal with this heinous disease. Moreover, rich country can supply the poor nations by constructing more schools, healthcare services or organize the campaign to increase awareness of resident in these countries, etc. Consequently, the economic assistance is not the only way to handle the thorny issue in developing countries, so we need to combine with others factors to make every person in the world are better-off.
In conclusion, there are tremendous solutions to help poor country decrease a poverty level instead of financial help. I wholeheartedly believe that the rich country should not only give money but also provide the goods and services to the others in order to ensure that they are not splashing their money for nothing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...ng whether the rich countries should or shouldnt subsidize the aid for the developing co...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
... a support in terms of economic, finance,.. from developed nations plays a pivotal...
^^
Line 3, column 58, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...a support in terms of economic, finance,.. from developed nations plays a pivotal ...
^^
Line 3, column 61, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: From
...upport in terms of economic, finance,.. from developed nations plays a pivotal role ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, except for, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2305.0 1615.20841683 143% => OK
No of words: 436.0 315.596192385 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28669724771 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87974311687 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490825688073 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 722.7 506.74238477 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1638851374 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.055555556 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2222222222 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314256172451 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103236104036 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.09457325381 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242654533095 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105978545703 0.056905535591 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.