The rising levels of congestion and air pollution found in most of the world cities can be attributed directly to the rapidly increasing number of private cars in use. In order to reverse this decline in the quality of life in cities, attempts must be made to encourage people to use their cars less and public transport more. Discuss possible ways to encourage the use of public transport.
To what extent do you agree with this statement?
You should write at least 250 words.
Most of the major cities in the globe are facing problem of traffic congestion and air pollution which need utmost attention and major possible cause is rapid growth in personal cars. Although many people support the idea to use public transport rather than personal cars, others believe that it is not sufficient to tackle the issue of pollution and congestion. I will scrutinize both the aspects in my further paragraphs before forming any opinion at the end.
On one side of the coin, abrupt increase in private car sales make air pollution and congestion more adverse. Government and few supporters urge people to use public transport instead of private car for their day-to-day activities. They believe that it will lower the carbon emission level which eventually lead to less pollution and will ease traffic congestion. What if uses of public transport increase beyond the capacity due to this awareness? What if government are forced to buy more buses to meet the requirement. Moreover, no one can deny that pollution of a bus more than a car.
On the other side of the coin, few people argue that reduction of private car is not the only best solution. A private car is the need of our busy society. Government should focus more on electrics cars and buses instead of reduction of car uses. Moreover, people should use cycles more often for their short distance trips. Government should take initiative in tree plantation and road widening activities rather than vehicle reduction which will eventually hit manufacturing industry.
To recapitulate, although encouragement to use public transport like buses, metros instead of cars will reduce pollution and congestion, there are other ways to handle this issue such as e-cars, tree plantation, and solar power metro trains.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-30 | shadow1222 | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-16 | BIBHU KALITA | 73 | view |
| 2018-08-06 | SanjeevC | 61 | view |
| 2018-07-20 | bindu983@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2017-09-21 | RSudhir | 61 | view |
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example from 73
- While parking his car in the lane outside your home, a neighbour has caused some damage to your car. You have decided to write to this neighbour.Write a letter to him/her. In the letter:– say why you are writing– describe the damage caused to your car 73
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem? 67
- You have seen an advertisement in an English newspaper for a job working in the City Museum shop during the holidays. You have decided to apply for the job.Write a letter to the director of the Museum. In your letter:– Introduce yourself– explain what 73
- Write a letter to the hospital. In your letterexplain why you would like to do unpaid work at the hospital say what type of unpaid work you would be able to dogive details of when you would be available for this workYou should write at least 150 words 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'electrics'' or 'electric's'?
Suggestion: electrics'; electric's
...ociety. Government should focus more on electrics cars and buses instead of reduction of ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 8.3376753507 300% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14383561644 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67491842693 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544520547945 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1112077294 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.133333333 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4666666667 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.66666666667 7.06120827912 24% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171584154837 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0616832945067 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460408922355 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103007913035 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406686573648 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.