Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves?
Currently there is a contentious argument that whether the government of developed countries should share their wealth among developing countries or not. In the following contemplation I will discuss that why I disagree that the wealthy countries should extend financial help to poorer countries.
The financial power of the wealthy nations depends upon the taxes collected from the citizens of the nation. Therefore, the government cannot decide to spend it on the citizens of another nation. Moreover, the poorer nations would not strive hard enough to attain development if they start receiving help from wealthy countries. For instance, in South Africa crime rate suddenly escalated when certain politicians started distributing free funds to poor states.
On the contrary, some people believe that the wealthy nations should help the poor nations by providing food and financial help. I believe that extending help in the form of relief fund is justified only during exceptional conditions such as natural disasters. For instance, all the nations come together to help the nation that suffer some natural disaster such as earthquake, hurricane or tsunami by providing relief fund. However. during normal course the developing countries should help themselves by trying to eradicate corruption, working hard, and educating the masses. For instance, in early 19th century China not only emerged from povery but now due to the hard work and determination it has become a successful financially independent developed nation.
In conclusion, I reiterate that all the nations must take the responsibility of their own financial matters in their own hands. Developed countries should focus on technological advancements and new research that might benefit the world instead of spending money for helping other nations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-11 | apurvparekh30 | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-30 | ndbro17 | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-30 | ndbro17 | 73 | view |
| 2021-02-27 | ankita.hpgdc | 78 | view |
| 2021-01-26 | Agni | 89 | view |
- Some think the best way to motivate and encourage people to work hard is to pay them based on how much they produce and sell To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- As people live longer and longer the idea of cloning human beings in order to provide spare parts is becoming a reality The idea horrifies most people yet it is no longer mere science fiction To what extent do you agree with such a procedure Have you any 61
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2002 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 67
- Some people believe that it is possible for a country to be economically successful and have a clean environment Others argue that these two aims are not compatible Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy things that we really do not need Others say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives Which viewpoint do you agree with Give reasons for your answer and include any rel 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 425, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ne or tsunami by providing relief fund. However. during normal course the developing co...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 434, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: During
...nami by providing relief fund. However. during normal course the developing countries ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55395683453 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84953848403 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58273381295 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.2894283869 49.4020404114 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 118.769230769 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344714288087 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125395120043 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0812034805394 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19556866316 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326403090493 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.