it is saying that-"Smoking is injurious to health"; Thus it should not be permitted in public places such as Shopping malls, Metro Stations, Bus stops and so forth. As it not only has a detrimental effect on smoker itself but on the surrounding people also. The viewpoint of prohibiting smoking also finds favors with me, owing to its negative impacts such as it can cause cancer moreover it creates air pollution which contributes towards environmental degradation. This essay will discuss negative effects of smoking and potential reasons for banning it.
Cigarette fumes contain carcinogenic substances that are medically proved the potential substance of cancer. Furthermore, some chain smokers tend to constantly smoke in public places; therefore, injecting lethal toxins in their bodies as well as in the bodies of the public around them through fumes. Thus lead to various kinds of cancer such as mouth cancer, lungs cancer and even blood cancer as well. For instance, it is evident from an article published by the newspaper " The Tribune", that family member of smokers likely to suffer from various breathing-related diseases such as Asthma and lungs infection and kidney failure due to lethal toxins absorbed through smoke air. Thus, smoking cigarette not only degrades the health of smoker but also nearby people indirectly. Thus banning cigarette in public places is certainly a positive approach to curb this menace.
Another negative impact of smoking is air pollution it causes. When a person smoke cigarette, then, toxins are absorbed in the air through fumes. Inhaling that air people can prone to various diseases. For instance, it is proved by a survey conducted by the Health Department of China is that a person can still suffer from cancer by inhaling smoking fumes constantly. So, smoker not only taking a toll on his health but on the other people also unintentionally.
To conclude, having analyzed the above mentioned dangerous effects of smoking in public such as it can be a threat to public health by spreading toxins in the air along with unintendedly causing the degrading public health. In this scenario, we are only left with banning smoking in public places as a viable solution to this problem.
- Some people think that because of email and telephones, communication among people is less personal now, then it used to be. Do you agree or disagree with that view ? Use specific reasons and examples to support your view. 73
- Some people believe that natural ability is necessary to be successful at sports. Others believe that hard work and practice is more important. Discuss both sides and add your own opinion. 84
- Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Homework is a part of school life Many people feel that giving homework daily to school children works well for them while some feel it is an unnecessary burden on them What do you think about it 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is saying that-'smoking is injurio...
^^
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding people'?
Suggestion: the surrounding people
...rimental effect on smoker itself but on the people around them. The viewpoint of prohibiting smoking a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nd potential reasons for banning it. As cigarette fumes contain carcinogenic su...
^^
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ential substance of cancer. Furthermore, some chain smokers tends to constantly s...
^^
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding public'?
Suggestion: the surrounding public
...heir bodies as well as in the bodies of the public around them through fumes. Thus lead to various kin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 397, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...cer, lungs cancer and even blood cancer also. For instance, it is evident from an ar...
^^^^
Line 5, column 64, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
... of smoking is air pollution it causes. when a person smoke cigarette then toxins ar...
^^^^
Line 5, column 64, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “when” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... of smoking is air pollution it causes. when a person smoke cigarette then toxins ar...
^^^^
Line 5, column 367, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...r by inhaling smoking fumes constantly. Thus smoker is not only taking a toll on his...
^^^^
Line 7, column 210, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...with unintendedly causing the degrading general public health. Thus, banning smoking is only a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, moreover, so, still, then, therefore, thus, well, for instance, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1872.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24369747899 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87170726269 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515406162465 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.5289932751 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3125 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.01903807615 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248858391259 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0944748585706 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585783031006 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170704186938 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290032809574 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.