Some countries are struggling with an increase in the rate of crime. Many people think that having more police on the streets is the only way to reduce crime.
It is often believed that to counter the increasing number of crimes, more police personals should be on patrol. Although I agree with this statement to a certain extent because hiring more police personals does infiltrate fear in the mind of criminals, I still think because of its cost incompetency, another viable solution must be needed.
On the one hand, raising the number of police force on the road can discourage criminals to commit crimes. That is to say that if a criminal sees a police officer at every block surveilling streets then they have to be extremely careful before committing any crime. Not only it will prevent the crime but also there will be prompt action, if any such situation arises, to catch the culprits. For instance, a downtown area in Miami, famous for Haitian gangs and criminals, was cleaned up by increasing the ratio of police by 2 times in crime-prone areas. That is how, number of criminals is inversely proportional to the number of police surveilling the streets.
On the other hand, hiring more personal piles up the burden on the security budgets. Nevertheless to mention that intaking more security staff is a very costly method to reduce crimes compare to other means such as CCTV cameras and automatic drones. Instead of 10 police officers, there could be 10 cameras, take a fraction of the police officer's remunerance, if installed on the streets. To illustrate, a CCTV installation project that took place in Delhi, in 2014, was costed around 400 million Rupees whereas 600 million Rupees have to pay in 6 months if officers got double in number. Therefore, it is safe to say there are other advance systems that can take some weight off from the security fund's shoulders and help.
To conclude, though I agree that adding up the number of cops can certainly reduce the crimes, I think that role of advance technologies cannot be neglected because it can make police more vigilant and help government to devise their fund more economically.
- many people believe that having a fixed punishment for all crimes is more efficient What are the advantages and disadvantages of having a fixed punishment 81
- You live in a room in college which you share with another student However there are many problems with this arrangement and you find it very difficult to work Write a letter to the accommodation officer at the college In your letter describe the situatio 70
- You took your family to a nearby restaurant You were disappointed with the meal and wish to complain to the manager Write a letter to the manager of the restaurant In your letter explain why you were at the restaurant describe the problems write about the 89
- Some countries are struggling with an increase in the rate of crime Many people think that having more police on the streets is the only way to reduce crime 84
- Health care should not be provided for free regardless of a person s income The health of a person is in their own hands and they should therefore be held accountable for that Do you agree with this opinion 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
... up the burden on the security budgets. Nevertheless to mention that intaking more security ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 572, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: double
...have to pay in 6 months if officers got double in number. Therefore, it is safe to say there are...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nevertheless, so, still, then, therefore, whereas, for instance, i think, such as, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91715976331 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66068298006 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57100591716 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.7413169327 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.846153846 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0769230769 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222179944142 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732611347637 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386547152761 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125645983869 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271613528467 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.