Some countries spend a lot of money to make bicycle usage easier. Why is this? Is this the best solution to traffic congestion?
Some governments allocate money for making safe and comfortable cycling lanes in order to improve the environment and reduce traffic on roads. In my opinion, this measure can give some results in the long term, but there are better measures, which could help to lessen the burden in the short term.
The main reason of financing cycle tracks is improving traffic flow in rush hours. If people are encouraged to use alternative transport instead buses and car, it will lead to declining number of vehicles on roads and consequently reducing traffic congestion. In addition, bicycle and stand up push scooter is pollution-free mode of transport. They do not use fossil fuels and as a result, they save tones of greenhouse gas emissions each year. In the long term, we can expect tremendous reduction of exhaust fumes emissions into the atmosphere.
However, in spite of benefits of arranging well-equipped bikeways, it may not be effective solution because only small part of citizens will support this kind of transport. It will take time to promote it and encourage sufficient number of people to use it. Therefore, as a short-term measure it will probably better way to organize public transport lanes and to build new multilevel road junctions and wider roads. Thus, convenient and fast public transport with well-organized road system will improve traffic-related issues.
In conclusion, main cause of investing funds into cycle lanes allocation by some nations is a desire to improve traffic on the roads and to solve the environment issues related to gas emissions. From my point of view, while it will affect mentioned issues in the long term, other measures can be taken to tackle them in the short-term.
- A friend has written to you asking for advice about a problem at work You have had a similar problem in the past Write a reply to your friend In your letter tell your friend you understand the problem explain what happened to you in the past suggest possi 73
- You visited your friend s hometown last month and promised to meet him but you could not Write to your friend Expressing your apology Explaining why you couldn t meet Suggesting when to meet later Arranging colleagues decide 56
- In some societies the number of crimes committed by teenagers is growing Some people think that regardless of age teenagers who commit major crimes should receive adult punishment To what extent do you agree 34
- Artists need a certain amount of freedom to develop their creativity Some people think that artists should have total freedom to express any thoughts and ideas To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- In many countries women and men are working full time It is therefore logical for women and men to share household tasks To what extent do you agree or disagree 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 337, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...taken to tackle them in the short-term.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, in my opinion, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13167259786 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84168102079 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608540925267 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5819420316 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.923076923 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3076923077 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112019952001 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0385697062496 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408410947279 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0738547639329 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499833047781 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.