In some developing countries, it is difficult to get good teachers to work in rural areas which can have a negative impact on the education of children in those rural communities. Why do you think good teachers do not want to work in rural area in develop

Education plays an important role in the life of each individual in particular and nations in general. But there is a significant matter existing in developing countries, which is the imbalance in terms of quantity of experienced teachers between rural areas and urban ones. I personally elucidate probable reasons along with possible solutions of this in following paragraphs.

As for the causes of this problem, it is likely to derive from poor quality of life. That is to say that, the weaknesses in respect of healthcare as well as education and the perks of occupation could be considered as a major reason, whereas urban areas get the best services combined with the competition of skilled tutors into each other to keep up with very rapid development of the community. Moreover, the difficulty in mobility may be a notable reason why it is awkward for teachers to approach remote areas.

Based on above-mentioned causes, it can be inferred that the government should provide teachers in rural areas with special treatment to attract more good teachers. Furthermore, it is recommended that the government invest in the growth of infrastructure as well as improve the quality of life there.

To sum up, if progressive nations want to advance firmly, all they have to do is balance the literacy indexes among different areas across the country.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, well, whereas, as for, in general, in particular, as well as, to sum up, that is to say

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1136.0 1615.20841683 70% => OK
No of words: 222.0 315.596192385 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11711711712 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9447748175 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.630630630631 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.9602500014 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.222222222 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.2222222222 7.06120827912 201% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237341404931 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0789718437154 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0848971232479 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127674356211 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031167403318 0.056905535591 55% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.