Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money. This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others. To what extent is this style of management effective? Are there better ways of encouraging employees to work hard?
Many companies award their staff member for their outstanding performance by distributing bonus amount. Some people argue that this approach could be beneficial for the rewarded employees, however, it might have adverse consequences on others. In my opinion, this approach is greatly effective. Before we reach to any conclusion, it is imperative to discuss why this approach is effective and what are other methods to motivate employees to perform better.
To begin with, awarding resources with monetary benefits is certainly effective because in this way both an employee and employer get mutually benefited. This is to say that when a resource performs efficiently then the productivity of the resource increases. As a result, overall productivity of the company increases and the company generates more revenue. Hence, if a company give extra bonus to their resources for their extraordinary performance, it is considered as a best approach. For example, as per the recent news, Gujrat's diamond merchant has gifted a car to his 100 to performer employees.
Admittedly, there better methods to motivate workers to work exponentially. Firstly, resources can be provided with work from home facility. Hence, they can spend more time with their family member, provided quality of work is not hampered. As a result, workers will be more satisfied with such an working model. Secondly, employees could be sent to onsite assignments, which would give them opportunity to learn and experience new working methodologies that are being practiced in other geographies. Thus, skillset of worked will improve. For instance, 78% of the IT companies agreed that they prefer to send only their top performing employees for client facing engagements.
To conclude, giving bonus as a token of appreciation to the best employees is followed by many companies. I believe this a considerably good approach. However, employees could be motivated to perform better by providing working from home and on-site opportunities. Even I work in an IT company, and getting involved in on-site engagement, with travel opportunities, motivates me more than additional bonus.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: ADDED_BONUS[1]
Message: This phrase might be redundant. Use simply 'bonus'.
Suggestion: bonus
... more revenue. Hence, if a company give extra bonus to their resources for their extraordin...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 473, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...dinary performance, it is considered as a best approach. For example, as per the ...
^
Line 5, column 296, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...orkers will be more satisfied with such an working model. Secondly, employees coul...
^^
Line 5, column 562, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
...rked will improve. For instance, 78% of the IT companies agreed that they prefer to se...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 281, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'an' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: an; IT
...d on-site opportunities. Even I work in an IT company, and getting involved in on-sit...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 287, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'companies'?
Suggestion: companies
...ite opportunities. Even I work in an IT company, and getting involved in on-site engage...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1822.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45508982036 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05896021886 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589820359281 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.5684217527 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.67935871743 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228333918869 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676053757052 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599346722526 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142450854396 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0777948825976 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.