Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others To what extent is this style of management e

One of the problems that has a heavy impact on the world’s economy is the problem of underpaid employees. Some employers try to account for that fact by paying higher salaries to workers who have made a major contribution to their field of work or to the company.
This statement has both positives and negative. On one side by rewarding staff members who have helped the business significantly can boost their morale, making them put even more effort into their work. This way other employees may feel motivated by the success of their coworker and start improving the quality of their work, which will benefit the company greatly. However, this may lead to a substantial rise in demand for an increase in salaries.
On the other hand, seeing how successful their fellow colleagues have become, employees may feel discouraged and dissatisfied to continue working in the establishment and make a decision to quit. A different factor, which could also lead to the same conclusion is that they may be not paid well enough. If they leave, there will be a dire need of a new personnel to fill in for the vacant positions and if new workers are not found there is a chance of the company going bankrupt.
I personally stand for increasing salaries of the working class and recompensing staff since it will help finding a solution to the unemployment problem that has stricken the world.

On a final note, there are many positives to the argument however there a few drawbacks that cannot be overlooked either.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 48, Rule ID: FELLOW_CLASSMATE[1]
Message: Use simply 'colleagues'.
Suggestion: colleagues
...other hand, seeing how successful their fellow colleagues have become, employees may feel discour...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 107, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to find' or 'find'.
Suggestion: to find; find
...d recompensing staff since it will help finding a solution to the unemployment problem ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, so, well, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1256.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84942084942 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69057953953 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594594594595 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 384.3 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1202339219 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.181818182 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5454545455 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270755704824 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0894640236493 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582167825309 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118294550683 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0922620036375 0.056905535591 162% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.