Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money. This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others.
To what extent is this style of management effective? Conscious
Are there better ways of encouraging employees to work hard.
Normally, an extraordinary performance of employees is likely to be rewarded by extra money in most organization. There is an argument about the efficiency of this convention. In my opinion, money is the most reserved reward for outstanding staffs when the managements know how to distribute them in the appropriate way.
To begin with, money plays a pivotal role in everyone’s lives, which makes it become the most desirable award. The fact that, a huge applause or compliment has no sense of material needs, while money has ability to fulfill both material and spiritual sectors. Moreover, other in-kind rewards such as vouchers, gift-card, foods or souvenirs do not have highly flexible functions in comparison with money. For example, the owners have freedom to use the money depending on their intentions, whereas, a cosmetic voucher can only be consumed by purchasing cosmetics. Therefore, with money, the rewarded staffs are allowed to satisfy his personal demands, which further motivate his working passions.
However, some people believe that, the additional money would create competition between staffs, which lead to a reduction in group working spirit. They think that the bonus money for the highest efficient staff has detrimental effects on the others. In term of this problem, the management needs to consider the social networking between partners and make conscious adjudgment for all well-deserved accomplishment. Otherwise, the production will be affected because the final results are accumulated and built-up by a team, not only one individual.
In conclusions, the effectiveness of extra money rewarded for significant contributions of hard-working employees cannot be altered by any other means.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | Sái Đức Lộc | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-20 | Arun rathour | 61 | view |
| 2018-08-18 | AhmedRaju | 73 | view |
| 2018-08-18 | AhmedRaju | 73 | view |
| 2018-08-04 | Ajay.dhariwal | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should writ
- Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money. This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others.To what extent is this style of management ef 89
- Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money. This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others.To what extent is this style of management ef 73
- Most people try to balance between their work and other parts of their lives. Unfortunately, not many achieve this balance. What are the reasons for this and what can be done to solve this. 61
- Most people try to balance between their work and other parts of their lives. Unfortunately, not many achieve this balance. What are the reasons for this and what can be done to solve this. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59848484848 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08082877953 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670454545455 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.8859084095 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.692307692 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250438086582 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083063846804 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482654434147 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15062094429 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354653094806 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.