Some employers want to be able to contact their staff at all times, even on holidays. Does this development have more disadvantages than advantages?

Essay topics:

Some employers want to be able to contact their staff at all times, even on holidays. Does this development have more disadvantages than advantages?

Technology is improving the way of communication and many organizations want to take the benefit of this advancement to bridge the gaps of connectivity between employees. It is believed by some managers that they should be able to contact their staff every moment they want to. In my opinion, this development has more benefits as compared with drawbacks.

On the positive side, the availability of employees all time can directly benefit the organization in terms of outcome. The communication between employees will be strong to put better results as a team. Employees can clear their doubt at any time without delaying and their problems can be solved which will directly improve the output of the organization. For instance, online WhatsApp group between company teams is very common these days to discuss the concern regarding shop floor activities and questions. Therefore, these benefits are to drive unity in the team and improved the outcome of all employees which directly benefits the organization.

On the negative side, the personal life of an employee is affected as the employee has to dedicate more time to his job. Contacting employees all the time can hinder their private life and other activities. This sometimes results in a stressful life and frustration with the company. In the majority of the cases, employees prefer to shift their jobs because of the inability to handle the pressure of presence all the time. A survey revealed that the persuading employees to be present all-time for an organization has adverse impacts on their family life balance.

In conclusion, despite negative impacts on the family and social culture, I believe that contacting employees all the time has more advantages for the organization as well as for the employee.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-07-27 bhatvishal@ 89 view
2019-07-27 bhatvishal@ 84 view
2019-07-27 bhatvishal@ 73 view
2019-07-27 bhatvishal@ 73 view
2019-02-08 pooyanfaizian 61 view
Essays by user bhatvishal@ :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, therefore, well, as for, as to, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20209059233 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8945624727 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526132404181 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0986946673 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.642857143 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199217617967 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074781188724 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562205243616 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132716758878 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063437170001 0.056905535591 111% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.