In some offices, employees work in enclosed workstations or cubicles. Other offices have a more open design, in which there are no walls separating employees from their coworkers. Which type of arrangement do you think is most effective? Explain, giving reasons to support your answer.
I have personally experienced both types of working arrangements i.e. enclosed cubicles and open-design offices. In this essay, I will share my experience of both these working setups and suggest which one is better than the other.
In the enclosed workstation setup, each employee is given a segregated enclosed space, giving them some level of privacy. The employees can freely do their work without worrying about someone peeping into some confidential data. This arrangement is more advantageous for the companies that deal with sensitive information about their customers, like law firms. It is important for such companies to ensure the customers' confidential data is safeguarded.
On the other hand, the open office designs encourage more open communication in the work culture. In such offices, the employees across all the levels i.e. senior management, mid-level management, and the team members are all sitting on the same floor without any walls. This kind of setup is usually very helpful for companies that require frequent discussions between employees. For example, a share trading firm. In such companies, the traders need to have short talks amongst themselves about the stock prices or available quantities, and enclosed cubicles would create a hindrance in their communication.
In nutshell, I believe both types of office arrangements are good for appropriate profiles of the companies. The companies should advantages of these arrangements towards the success and growth of their business. Certain companies can use an enclosed setup to avoid any security incidents, whereas other sets of companies can bring ease of communication through open design.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-03 | umangrdoshi | 67 | view |
| 2021-01-20 | docotrieu86@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2020-06-03 | bonelfin | 36 | view |
- In some offices employees work in enclosed workstations or cubicles Other offices have a more open design in which there are no walls separating employees from their coworkers Which type of arrangement do you think is most effective Explain giving reasons 67
- Write a letter to the local council about the poor condition of roads in your area Include the following in your letter Explain the situation and roads condition How does it affect you and other people Suggest what measures need to be taken in your opinio 92
- Write about the following topic It has been noted that many people who had a big impact on the world gave themselves completely to their work and did not bother with the idea of work life balance To what extent should people try to have a good work life b 67
- You have decided to leave your current job and look for a new one Write a letter to a friend In your letter explain why you want to leave your current job describe what kind of job you are looking for ask for some help or advice 87
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'peeps'.
Suggestion: peeps
...eir work without worrying about someone peeping into some confidential data. This arran...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, whereas, for example, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1426.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5486381323 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94452537397 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614785992218 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1533638986 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.857142857 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3571428571 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285808755294 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0933763870579 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787147746431 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169250908927 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324636443781 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.