Write about the following topic.
It has been noted that many people who had a big impact on the world gave themselves completely to their work and did not bother with the idea of “work-life balance”. To what extent should people try to have a good work-life balance?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
The concept of "work-life balance" has been trending recently. People, in general, have started talking about the burnouts from work and the recalibration of work-life balance. In this essay, I will explain the pros and cons of this concept and share my opinion using examples.
If we look at the various people who made big impacts on the world, they have always gone above and beyond their call-of-the-duty to make that contribution. For example, Steve Jobs has left an astounding legacy of "Apple", one of the largest and most successful private companies of all time. The unique quality and usability of the Apple products are the result of the strong foundation built by Steve Jobs. If you read his biography, it clearly shows that he worked round the clock for years, to build this company and bring it to the level it was when he left. It was his passion for work that yielded these achievements, which always took precedence over his family. And we all also know about the public outcry of his daughter about him not being there for the family.
On the other hand, if we look at a regular worker, an average middle-class person, who wants to work just enough to put food on the table. Most of these people see themselves committed to their family and personal life equally, if not more, compared to their work life. These people are not the ones who are on a mission to change the world or make it a better place to live. And for these people, work is just a part of life and there is a much bigger part of life - the personal life - that is more important.
If we compare these two categories of people, the key difference is their priorities in life. All of us have the same 24 hours in a day, and there are only limited things that can be prioritized for anyone. The first category of people chose to prioritize their passion towards work, while others chose family and work-life balance.
I believe there is nothing right or wrong, and people should be free to choose whether work-life balance is important in their life and they thrive to achieve that, or they let that go to achieve something else through their work life. We need a few crazy people like Steve Jobs to change the world, but not everyone can do that as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-02 | LaraNg | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-06 | umangrdoshi | 67 | view |
| 2020-04-01 | kjot_59 | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-26 | RajatSharma1 | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-11 | rohit1234 | 73 | view |
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- You are planning to return to your hometown after a long absence Write a letter to one of your old friends In your letter Explain that you are coming and that you d like to meet again Describe what you re planning to do Say where you re staying and when y 73
- Write a letter to the local council about the poor condition of roads in your area Include the following in your letter Explain the situation and roads condition How does it affect you and other people Suggest what measures need to be taken in your opinio 92
- Write a letter to your manager about a computer system problem that you have encountered and say Describe the problem How it is affecting your work What needs to be done about it 87
- In some offices employees work in enclosed workstations or cubicles Other offices have a more open design in which there are no walls separating employees from their coworkers Which type of arrangement do you think is most effective Explain giving reasons 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, so, well, while, for example, in general, talking about, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 24.0651302605 204% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1866.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 403.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63027295285 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55863713532 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535980148883 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4186731547 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.666666667 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3888888889 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358800062649 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112640248971 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0933138149097 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212743841985 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566837536865 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 50.2224549098 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, so, well, while, for example, in general, talking about, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 24.0651302605 204% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1866.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 403.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63027295285 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55863713532 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535980148883 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4186731547 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.666666667 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3888888889 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358800062649 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112640248971 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0933138149097 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212743841985 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566837536865 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 50.2224549098 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.